Archive for the ‘ tv ’ Category

2013 Emmy Predictions (Top Contenders) – Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series


anna chlumsky veep

Interestingly enough, there was a time when, before the actual nominations came out, voters would narrow down all the contenders to the “top 10″. They obviously don’t do that anymore. But…we can still assume which contenders are at the top of the voter’s minds. Before I release my official nomination predictions around early July, I am going to run down which 10 or so contenders are the biggest threats…and maybe some personal long shots that I believe voters should consider. Here we go!

(Yeah…I copied that opening paragraph from last season…deal with it.)

For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Here are the top Emmy contenders for Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series. In alphabetical order…

1. mayim bialik (the big bang theory): PRO: Last year, she earned her first nomination in what was a minor shock. This year, with two slots “open” in this category, she could definitely find herself back. For one reason or another, I didn’t watch the show this season, but I do believe, based on the last season, she definitely elevated the show and made it funnier. In short – if voters still love the show, they’ll still love her. CON: But if the voters decide they no longer support the show, then I think she’d be hanging on by a thread.

2. julie bowen (modern family): PRO: She won in this category the last two years. There’s no way she’s going to suddenly be dropped after winning the two previous years. CON: But then there was Jeremy Piven who was completely dropped after three wins in a row. As Mary Poppins sings, “Anything can happen…”

3. anna chlumsky (veep): PRO: As the level headed VP’s chief of staff, Chlumsky plays the role with such control and adept comic timing. With more and more people appreciating the show, I could see voters looking beyond Julia-Louis Dreyfuss and giving one of her co-stars a supporting nomination. In that case, I think Chlumsky has the strongest chance in this relatively wide open category. CON: Worst case scenario – the voters won’t be able to look past JLD.

4. kaley cuoco (the big bang theory): PRO: Despite the additions of Bialik and Melissa Rauch, Cuoco still sort of remains the “female face” of the show. Although Jim Parsons has become the show’s MVP, I think some of the show’s growing success should also be credited towards Cuoco, who plays her “dumb blonde” character with such enthusiasm and earnestness. CON: However, in the show’s six seasons, she’s never gotten a nomination. It’s admittedly silly that I still consider her a “top contender” when other people who have actually gotten nominations aren’t anymore…

5. sarah hyland (modern family): PRO: Like I did with “Supporting Actor,” I’ve decided to include the kids here because I think the show’s popular enough for even them to be serious contenders. However, this was honestly started because at this year’s Critics’ Choice Awards (which should really be called “The Underrated Awards”), Hyland was the only part of Modern Family that received a nomination. So…I dunno, are people beginning to look past age and notice her as a worthy nominee? CON: Critics don’t vote for the Emmys.

6. jane krakowski (30 rock): PRO: The biggest disappointment from last year were the voters snubbing Jane K. After three nominations in a row, Krakowski was passed over despite being the funniest thing about season 6 of 30 Rock. However, with this being 30 Rock‘s last season (and with Jenna getting one of the final moments of the series, singing a hilarious rendition of “Rural Juror”), I could see Krakowski overcoming the “once you’re out, you’re out” rule and getting one last chance to submit an episode. CON: After her snub last year (and never winning before then), I’m not sure if the voters have much regard for Krakowski. I could see this going either way.

7. kate mckinnon (saturday night live): PRO: Kristen Wiig was nominated the last four years in this category. With her out of the way this year, there is an open spot…and that spot could easily go to another SNL player. While Nasim and Vanessa are main cast members,  those two didn’t have the impact that would get them noticed. That’s where featured player Kate McKinnon would come in. Dubbed as the “next Kristen Wiig” because her wide array of impression and eccentricities, I believe she has the best chance at continuing the “Supporting Actress SNL” legacy that Amy Poehler started. CON: But, at the same time, she’s only a featured player. And in terms of screen time, she hasn’t stood out the same way Wiig did. This will be tough for her.

8. cecily strong (saturday night live): PRO: If there’s been a surprise this SNL season, it has been Strong’s coming of age. Very quickly, she fit right in the cast; and by the end of the season, she was the “go to female” for many of the sketches. Her breakout sketches were definitely “Girl You Wish…” spots she had during Weekend Update. She has proven herself to be a versatile cast member and has a lot of people (including me) rooting for her. CON: Let’s face it, even if the voters consider giving a spot to one of the SNL ladies…it’ll only be one of them. So…which one? Which one?

9. sofia vergara (modern family): PRO: Although she hasn’t won an Emmy, she must be pretty pleased with her three nominations + a bundle of nominations from other notable award shows, including The Golden Globes. She’s also the face of every product in America, appearing in over 100 commercials a year (OK, I made that statistic up, but, still, she is EVERYWHERE.) People love her. She’s in. CON: I think…Julie Bowen has a better chance at a nomination than her. That doesn’t matter because…most voters will naturally find space for both of them.

10. jessica walter (arrested development): PRO: While reviews for the show have been mixed, many have been impressed with how quickly Walter slipped into the role of Lucille Bluth after a 7 year break. She won an Emmy in 1975 and was nominated three times afterwards, with her latest nomination being for the second season of Arrested Development. I could definitely see her getting in, even if the show doesn’t receive widespread awards support. CON: However, she wasn’t nominated for the 1st and 3rd seasons of AD, so her record is spotty at best. Maybe she’ll get a nod for her voice work on Archer instead. Shrug!

11. merritt wever (nurse jackie): PRO: After two years of being snubbed, Wever received her first nomination last year; this shows that she’s always been an “under the radar” contender and that I grossly misjudged her chances (she was a “long shot” last year when I was doing this) . Not anymore! I don’t know if she’ll receive another nomination, but clearly she has fans with the Academy and clearly she will get a substantial amount of voters. CON: I’ve heard rumblings that this season didn’t live up to the overall excellent fourth one. If that’s true then…[holds onto collar in a nervous manner.]

12. betty white (hot in cleveland): PRO: The Awards favorite has a bundle of nominations and 5 wins. She received a nomination for this show a couple years ago. And then last year she received a nomination for “Outstanding Host,” presumably getting a nomination over “four times in a row” winner Jeff Probst. It seems like she always has to be nominated for something every year so…maybe it’ll be this show again. She’s also won two SAGs and was nominated for a third one which shows widespread support among the actors in the Academy. CON: She wasn’t nominated for Hot in Cleveland last year. Maybe the “raunchy grandma” routine is getting old to some people?

13. allison williams (girls): PRO: If Girls is going to receive acting nominations outside Lena Dunham, then I think Adam Driver and Allison Williams have the strongest chance. Williams’s character felt more fleshed out this second time around, mostly because her story lines were away from Hannah’s (Lena Dunham). Also her performance of “Stronger” may have impressed voters. CON: Similar to Driver’s “CON,” Allison Williams doesn’t have a very funny character. Actually, she may be the most serious character on the show.

14. ariel winter (modern family): PRO: Winter is growing up – it’s as simple as that. Also between her personal issues (which I won’t go into) and her new animated show on Disney, she’s getting a lot of exposure outside Modern Family. That will only help her out. CON: The Emmys just don’t nominate kids. It was worth a try though.

Other strong contenders: Ellen Barkin (The New Normal), Diane Ladd (Enlightened), Cloris Leachman (Raising Hope), Jane Lynch (Glee), Wendie Malick (Hot in Cleveland), Melissa Rauch (The Big Bang Theory), Alia Shawkat (Arrested Development), Hannah Simone (New Girl)

Long shots worth considering: Kristen Bell (House of Lies), Valerie Bertinelli (Hot in Cleveland), Conchata Ferrell (Two and a Half Men), Jenna Fischer (The Office), Ellie Kemper (The Office), Jemima Kirke (Girls), Jane Leeves (Hot in Cleveland), Zosia Mamet (Girls)

Even longer shots I recommend checking out: Sufe Bradshaw (Veep), Yvette Nicole Brown (Community), Carrie Brownstein (Portlandia), Tamsin Greig (Episodes), Angela Kinsey and Phyllis Smith (The Office), Retta (Parks and Recreation), Maya Rudolph (Up All Night), Amy Schumer (Amy Schumer), Eden Sher (The Middle), Casey Wilson (Happy Endings), Bebe Wood (The New Normal)

2013 Emmy Predictions (Top Contenders) – Supporting Actor in a Drama Series


corey stoll house of cards

Interestingly enough, there was a time when, before the actual nominations came out, voters would narrow down all the contenders to the “top 10″. They obviously don’t do that anymore. But…we can still assume which contenders are at the top of the voter’s minds. Before I release my official nomination predictions around early July, I am going to run down which 10 or so contenders are the biggest threats…and maybe some personal long shots that I believe voters should consider. Here we go!

(Yeah…I copied that opening paragraph from last season…deal with it.)

For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Here are the top Emmy contenders for Supporting Actor in a Drama Series. In alphabetical order…

This category was particularly difficult for me (it usually is) so…hopefully, whoever gets nominated in this category is at least mentioned in this post, whether they’re a “top contender” or not…

1. jonathan banks (breaking bad): PRO: Banks had a really great season this year. With Giancarlo Esposito out of the way, Banks was really been allowed to stand out as the “real badass in charge.” I don’t want to give any spoilers away but…let’s just say…something happens to his character by the end of the season that would make voters more inclined to pick him this year. CON: This would be his first nomination for the show so…it’s tricky. Otherwise, all signs should point towards a nomination.

2. jim carter (downton abbey): PRO: People don’t want to admit it, but he was nominated last year so, technically, he is a top contender. This season, Carter did more of the same…but it’s that “same” that the voters liked the last season. I could see him repeating. CON: Was Carter really nominated last year because voters genuinely admired his performance…or because they just wanted to give Downton Abbey as many nominations as possible? I believe Carter’s nomination mostly depends on how voters regarded the show this season.

3. alan cumming (the good wife): PRO: He’s been nominated twice (once for guest) for this role, but he was snubbed last year. People still really like how quirky this character is. He brings a sense of humor to the show and definitely stands out among the cast. Out of all the supporting actors on the show, he has the best chance of squeezing in. Also, if the New York voters watched his performance of Macbeth on Broadway and was upset that he was snubbed at the Tonys, giving him an Emmy nomination might make up for it. CON: I’m trying to think off the top of my head what “episode” he would submit if he got a nomination. I honestly can’t. Maybe that’s just my bad memory but…I don’t know if he stood out this season IMO.

4. peter dinklage (game of thrones): PRO: He won for his first season and received another nomination last year. The Emmy voters don’t seem to appreciate the cast much, but Dinklage is the one actor that stands out among them. CON: I’m the only person in the world that doesn’t watch this show regularly. I’m also the only person in the world who (from the little I’ve seen) isn’t crazy about his performance.

5. noah emmerich (the americans): PRO: I don’t know anything about this show or his role on the show, but I do know that Emmerich (of Truman Show fame) is a long working, respected actor who’s never been nominated before. If this show becomes the Emmy hit it is destined to be, I could see this as Emmerich’s chance at getting in. People are already predicting him for a nomination. CON: However, if The Americans doesn’t get the broad Emmy support, I’d be little surprised to see Emmerich’s name on the list of 6.

6. larry hagman (dallas): PRO: Despite its relatively good reviews, I don’t think Dallas was destined to be much of an Emmy favorite. However, voters may want to honor Hagman for his contribution to television and give him a posthumous nomination “John Ritter-style.” It’s not too far-fetched. He was nominated for the role in the 80′s a couple times, and he has gotten some good notices for his performance in the revival. I could definitely see a spot saved for him. CON: I hate asking this but…would Larry Hagman be such a strong contender if he were still alive? I don’t watch the show so I don’t truly know. However, I wasn’t hearing people say “Larry Hagman deserves an Emmy” before his death. Just a thought…

7. rob james-collier (downton abbey): PRO: Who else watched “Episode 7″ and went OH SHIT!? Yeah, exactly. This season, we saw a different side of Thomas. A more vulnerable side of him that voters, who we know watch the show, may appreciate. With Brendan Coyle curiously not being submitted, James-Collier could rightfully take the now empty Downton Abbey spot for this category. CON: James-Collier has always given a good performance, so why hasn’t he been nominated before? Even last season, him being nominated would have probably made more sense than Jim Carter. It’ll be interesting if voters have just noticed Rob James-Collier.

8. vincent kartheiser (mad men): PRO: At this point, it may seem silly to anticipate a Vincent Kartheiser nomination. However, John Slattery’s snub last year in favor of the new Jared Harris may give us some newfound hope. Maybe voters have just realized that there could possibly be more deserving actors than John Slattery…including Kartheiser. CON: Or…maybe Harris only got nominated last year because his character committed suicide, and now that he’s not eligible, Slattery will take his spot on the short list again. Maybe they’ll continue to snub Kartheiser the same way they’ve been snubbing him the last 5 years.

9. mandy patinkin (homeland): PRO: Last year, Patinkin didn’t get a nomination. The writers of Homeland took note and gave Patinkin stronger, more emotional material. In some cases, he would be the best thing about an episode. Last year, I didn’t particularly think he deserved a nomination. This year? I think he would be in my personal top 6. Do the voters feel the same way? Despite the criticisms this season has accumulated, Homeland is still expected to have a strong showing, possibly even stronger than last year. CON: But still…he wasn’t nominated last year. So this year will be especially nail-biting.

10. aaron paul (breaking bad): PRO: He has been nominated three times, winning for his last two eligible years. Even last year when most people were predicting Esposito (not me!), he still prevailed. He continues to be intense and sublime in his role and there is NO reason why he should be left off this year. CON: Absolutely no reason.

11. john slattery (mad men): PRO: He was consistently nominated for the show’s first four years before being dropped last season in favor of Jared Harris. However, now that Harris is gone, I could Slattery comfortably taking his spot again. Similar to Cumming, Slattery is nice comedic relief for the show and usually breaks the tension. Also, that signature grey hair? Sa-exy. CON: Even though Mad Men is a very popular show among voters, the “once you’re out, you’re out” rule may still apply to John Slattery. Also, so far (the show still has only one episode left to air), Slattery hasn’t been given too much to do.

12. corey stoll (house of cards): PRO: Since Midnight in Paris, Stoll has broken out and become a truly a respected actor. His performance in House of Cards has gotten praise and even earned him a Critics Choice Award nomination. If a complete newcomer can squeeze into the race, it’s probably Stoll. CON: Despite the praise, sometimes it takes a year or two before an actor is nominated. Just ask Aaron Paul…or even Michael C. Hall. Sometimes a voter simply needs more proof of worthiness before adding him to his or her ballot.

13. Sam Waterston (the newsroom): PRO: He’s been nominated for eight Emmys, but he’s never won for an acting performance. Nonetheless, he’s clearly an Emmy favorite and, I believe, being on the long running (and maybe tiring) Law & Order has kept him from receiving more Emmy nods. With this new, fresh role as network president Charlie Skinner, maybe he finally has a chance for Emmy glory. CON: No Golden Globe nomination might be a crutch (although, it’s much harder for a supporting performer to get nominated for a Golden Globe than an Emmy). Still, this show is very divided and Waterston will need all the people who love the show to vote for him in order to get the nomination.

Other strong contenders: Bobby Cannavale (Boardwalk Empire), Josh Charles (The Good Wife), Guillermo Diaz (Scandal), Ben Feldman (Mad Men), Walton Goggins (Justified), David Harewood (Homeland), Kit Harington (Game of Thrones), Freddie Highmore (Bates Motel), Mads Mikkelsen (Hannibal), John Noble (Fringe), Dean Norris (Breaking Bad), Kevin Rahm (Mad Men)

Long shots worth considering: Michael Cuditz (Southland), Matt Czurchy (The Good Wife), Tony Goldwyn (Scandal), Jeff Perry (Scandal), Michael Shannon (Boardwalk Empire)

Even longer shots I recommend checking out: Noel Fisher, Cameron Monaghan, and Jeremy Allen White (Shameless), Jordan Garavis (Orphan Black), James Pickens Jr. (Grey’s Anatomy)

Read the ballots here to see who else was submitted in this category. Thanks for reading! More coming soon! For more Emmy stuff, click here.

2013 Emmy Predictions (Top Contenders) – Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series


girls adam driver

Interestingly enough, there was a time when, before the actual nominations came out, voters would narrow down all the contenders to the “top 10″. They obviously don’t do that anymore. But…we can still assume which contenders are at the top of the voter’s minds. Before I release my official nomination predictions around early July, I am going to run down which 10 or so contenders are the biggest threats…and maybe some personal long shots that I believe voters should consider. Here we go!

(Yeah…I copied that opening paragraph from last season…deal with it.)

For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Here are the top Emmy contenders for Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series. In alphabetical order…

1. will arnett (arrested development): PRO: He’s been nominated for five Emmys, four of those being for his guest role on 30 Rock, and one for Arrested Development‘s “last” season. Voters clearly know who he is and enjoy his work. CON: There are a couple cons, though. One, he’s been a regular on THREE series since Arrested Development ended, but he’s only gotten Emmy recognition for 30 Rock. So…he probably has a better chance getting one last guest nomination for 30 Rock, than a nomination for this more crowded “Modern Family-loving” category. And, second…the divorce from Amy Poehler. Just sayin’…some friends of Amy Poehler may not want to vote for him. Ridiculous, but possible.

2. ty burrell (modern family): PRO: He’s been nominated the last three years, winning for his second. He’s also been nominated for the  SAGs and Golden Globes among other things. I think he and Eric Stonestreet have the best chance at staying another year among the males on the show. CON: …and I think Eric Stonestreet has a better chance than Ty Burrell when it comes to being nominated again. So there’s that!

3. adam driver (girls): PRO: Adam Driver is arguably the best actor (male or female) on Girls. I mean, he went to Juilliard! I think Driver has done some really deep and interesting things with a character that could have been expendable. And with Girls itself getting a lot of Emmy buzz, Driver could benefit from the show’s predicted domination. CON: He hasn’t been nominated for anything so far, although it’s still pretty early for him. Also…his character isn’t really “funny.” For voters who like their comedy contenders to make them laugh (and not be “rapey”), Driver wouldn’t be their ideal candidate.

4. jesse tyler ferguson (modern family): PRO: He was nominated for the last three seasons. While I didn’t much care for him or his character in the beginning of the first season, I think Ferguson has come to his own and is making a bigger impression with every episode. Also, he’s just a friendly personality and seems to be really popular. Take his recent appearance at this year’s Tonys. CON: Besides a recent People Choice Award nomination, he’s never really been nominated for anything outside the Emmys. I’ve made this claim the last three years and he still keeps getting nominated so…screw it! He’s in.

5. nolan gould (modern family): PRO: I think the kids are becoming old enough to be serious Emmy contenders. I mean, honestly, I think 4 of the 6 slots will be filled by the Modern Family men so there’s no point highlighting too many actors outside the show. Uh…where was I going with this? Yeah, Gould is a contender. Congratulations! CON: The Emmys don’t like kids. Unless your character has been molested by Ted Danson or you’re Anne Frank, it’s hard for someone under the age of 21 to get a nomination.

6. max greenfield (new girl): PRO: Earned his first nomination last year. New Girl continues to be a hit with audiences and critics. And even though Jake Johnson has gotten a lot of praise, people still seem to love Schmidt (also, who cares? Jake Johnson is competing in lead which moreso helps Greenfield). Also, Greenfield in a fat suit = Emmy gold. CON: I didn’t watch every episode of New Girl this season, but it doesn’t seem like Greenfield’s character did as much as he did during the first season. He could be passed over for a newer contender.

7. bill hader (saturday night live): PRO: Earned a semi-surprising Emmy nomination last season after 6 years of being snubbed. Between the legendary “Puppet sketch” and the fact that it’s his last season, he has a great chance of repeating for one last chance at Emmy gold. CON: Again, his nomination last year sort of came out of nowhere. This is the year where we’ll find out whether his nomination was a fluke or not. (I hope not because think he was deserving last season and he would be deserving this year.)

8. taran killam (saturday night live): PRO: With this being his first year as a full cast member, he has broken out as one of the show’s most reliable cast members, with a slew of impressive impressions…or what I like to call: impressions. (Puns!) Anyway, voters seem to like SNL cast members (Poehler, Wiig, Hader). I could see Killam, as the show’s new alpha-male, joining that list. CON: Once Hader, Armisen, and maybe even Sudeikis, leave the show next season, I could see Killam standing out even more, thus having a better chance at getting a nomination.

9. ed o’neill (modern family): PRO: Although he was shockingly snubbed during the show’s first year, he’s been redeemed with receiving two nominations afterwards. How many more ways are there to say “The Emmys love Modern Family”? CON: His character isn’t as flamboyant or “out there” as the others. His character is very grounded (from what I’ve noticed). Older voters may appreciate him…but will the younger ones be entertained?

10. rico reodriguez (modern family): PRO: Because at this point, he has a better f@#kin’ chance at getting in than Nick Offerman. CON: The “kid thing” I mentioned earlier. Also…I just think after the first season, the novelty his character had became less interesting. JMO. He probably deserved a nomination for the show’s first season. After that? Eh…

11. eric stonestreet (modern family): PRO: He’s been nominated the last three years. He won for the show’s first season and, again (against most predictions) for the third season. Also, his cameo in Identity Thief may give him more visibility. He’s a crazy, fun character and, for better or worse, he’s memorable. CON: The character’s lack of nuance or subtlety may - who am I kidding? It’s comedy! People love his shtick!

12. jeffrey tambor (arrested development): PRO: He’s been nominated for six Emmys, including two for Arrested Development. AD has gotten so much buzz that one of the supporting actors are bound to get in. Just…which one? CON: Based on pure name recognition, Tambor could get in. However…let’s be honest, his two episodes this season were probably the weakest. I believe there are more deserving supporting actors from the show (like Will Arnett). Maybe I’m not alone in this.

Other strong contenders: Fred Armisen (SNL or Portlandia), Michael Cera (Arrested Development), Chris Colfer (Glee), David Cross (Arrested Development), Tony Hale (Veep), Neil Patrick Harris (How I Met Your Mother), Simon Helberg (The Big Bang Theory), Lamorne Morris (New Girl), Nick Offerman (Parks and Recreation), Jason Sudeikis (SNL)

Long shots worth considering: Ed Helms (The Office), Alex Karpovsky (Girls), Jack McBrayer (30 Rock), Chris Messina (The Mindy Project), Tracy Jordan (30 Rock), Kunal Nayyar (The Big Bang Theory), Mike White (Enlightened), Rainn Wilson (The Office)

Even longer shots I recommend checking out: Doesn’t Scott Adsit (30 Rock) finally deserve some recognition? Also: Keegan Michael Key and Jordan Peele (Key and Peele), Stephen Mangan (Episodes), Garrett Morris (2 Broke Girls), Reid Scott, Timothy Simons, and Matt Walsh (Veep), Kenan Thompson (SNL), James Van Der Beek (Don’t Trust the B…)

Read the ballots here to see who else was submitted in this category. Thanks for reading! More coming soon! For more Emmy stuff, click here.

2013 Emmy Predictions (Top Contenders) – Lead Actress in a Drama Series


tatiana maslany orphan black

Interestingly enough, there was a time when, before the actual nominations came out, voters would narrow down all the contenders to the “top 10″. They obviously don’t do that anymore. But…we can still assume which contenders are at the top of the voter’s minds. Before I release my official nomination predictions around early July, I am going to run down which 10 or so contenders are the biggest threats…and maybe some personal long shots that I believe voters should consider. Here we go!

(Yeah…I copied that opening paragraph from last season…deal with it.)

For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Here are the top Emmy contenders for Lead Actress in a Drama Series. In alphabetical order…

1. connie britton (nashville): PRO: She was nominated last year in the Movie/Miniseries category for American Horror Story, and then two times in a row in this category for Friday Night Lights. She’s obviously become an Emmy favorite. Nashville was one of the most buzzed new network drama series of the season and she’s right in the center of that buzz. CON: Yes, she was nominated for a Golden Globe this year but…I dunno…can she really get an Emmy nomination? Nashville is a fun show, but I’m not sure if the show (and her performance) are top 6 material. Although…I honestly haven’t watched the show since January so maybe things have changed.

2. glenn close (damages): PRO: She’s been nominated for this role every year she’s been eligible, and she won 2 Emmys for the first 2 seasons. Even if voters have become disinterested in the show itself, they still seem very fond of Close. This is the show’s last year. Voters may want to honor her. Also…she’s Glenn Close. CON: The series finale aired so long ago…I remember it being a great finale, but did the voters remember?

3. claire danes (homeland): PRO: C’mon. Danes has created one of the most complex, intense female characters for television. Carrie Mathison has practically become an icon. On a technical front…she has an Emmy, 2 Golden Globes, and a SAG for this season (obviously, this is specifically for Homeland.) There’s no way she’s missing out this year. CON: Homeland has gotten some “The Killing”-sized criticism this year…but I doubt that should affect Danes much. She’s in. She’s totally in.

4. michelle dockery (downton abbey): PRO: While Maggie Smith is the only actor on the show to actually win awards, Dockery has also set herself from the cast with all her nominations – an Emmy nomination last year, a Golden Globe nod, and a “hard to get” SAG nomination. She was given a lot to work with this season and if voters liked her performance last year, then they probably like what she did this year. CON: However, this year, the Lead Actress category is even more competitive with a lot of new worthy contenders. I haven’t made an official prediction, but I don’t think she’s as much of a lock as Claire Danes or even Julianna Margulies. We’ll see. (I know, this goes against what I wrote earlier.)

5. vera farmiga (bates motel): PRO: Before Bates Motel, Vera Farmiga was mostly a movie actress (with an Oscar nomination under her belt). But the Television Academy loves movie stars doing TV. I’m not trying to compare Farmiga to Glenn Close…buuut…actually, I won’t go there. But Bates Motel has gotten a strong critical reception and some people are actually predicting Farmiga so I’ll put her as a top contender. She was also nominated for a TCA Award. CON: It’s a new, “spring semester” show in an already crowded year…and, despite her Oscar nomination, Farmiga isn’t necessarily a household name. She certainly won’t get nomination through blind name recognition.

6. julianna margulies (the good wife): PRO: Along with her one Emmy and two nominations for this role, she has pretty much been nominated (and won) for every other major award out there. Her performance in this season was no different than the three before it (in fact, it was probably better). She has a real, wonderful leading role on a wonderful TV series. CON: Last year, the show wasn’t nominated for Drama Series. Uh oh! Do voters not like this show anymore???

7. tatiana maslany (orphan black): PRO: She could certainly be the surprise hit of the Emmys. If voters took the time to actually watch this show, they’d realize how EXCELLENT she is. Seriously, I’m only on the 4th episode and she’s already played like 10 roles. She’s a chameleon and has a harder task than any of the the other contenders here. She not only deserves a nomination…but I believe she deserves win. (I may be biased, I’ve been a fan of her since her days on renegadepress.com.) CON: Yeah, she’s been getting notice from the various critics awards…but they’ve never been great Emmy predictors. She’s an unfamous Canadian actress on a show very few people realize exist. This is going to take prayer.

8. elizabeth moss (mad men): PRO: She’s been nominated four times for this role and will probably get another nomination this year.. Moss definitely does some very interesting things with this character. She’s my favorite thing about the show right now. CON: …although, I can’t say she would be in my personal top 6. Let’s wait and see…

9. keri russell (the americans): PRO: Interestingly enough, she was never nominated for Felicity (despite a Golden Globe win). However, this new, darker, maturer, critically acclaimed role might do the trick. Both she and the show are receiving a lot of buzz. CON: There’s not really much of a “con” to be honest. Only time will tell how the Emmys respond to the show. Ya neva know!

10. kyra sedgwick (the closer): PRO: Before finally winning the Emmy in 2010, she was nominated four times. However, after 2010, she was strangely dropped from the lineup and hasn’t recovered since then. Still, this is her last season, and voters may want to put her back in the race one last time (for this role, at least.) CON: The old Emmy rule: “Once you’re out, you’re out!” Another Emmy rule: “The Emmys aren’t as sentimental as we think they are.” I think Kristen Wiig and the late great Kathryn Joosten can attest to that.

11. kerry washington (scandal): PRO: Seriously, Scandal is not only a great show, but Kerry Washington absolutely nails it. She does so well with portraying “pain and regret,” all the while being a buttkicking badass in the process. She hasn’t been nominated for anything major yet…but the Emmys could fix that mistake. CON: Network dramas and Emmys never seem to be a good mix. Mark my words – if this show were on Showtime or HBO or AMC, Washington would be a much more confident contender here.

12. robin wright (house of cards): PRO: Emmy voters love women in power. Like Tina Fey mentioned in 2010: “These women are terrifying.” Wright plays her character with a confident and subtle power. Emmy voters like that kind of stuff. I wouldn’t be surprised if she got a nomination. CON: …I also wouldn’t surprised if she didn’t get in. When it comes to House of Cards, people are talking about Kevin Spacey and Corey Stoll…I just don’t think the women on the show are getting much recognition.

Other strong contenders: Mariska Hargitay (Law and Order: SVU), Mary McDonnell (Major Crimes), Emmy Rossum (Shameless)

Long shots worth considering: Taraji P. Henson (Person of Interest), Lucy Liu (Elementary), Anna Paquin (True Blood), Ellen Pompeo (Grey’s Anatomy), Katey Sagal (Sons of Anarchy)

Even longer shot I recommend checking out: Jennifer Love Hewitt (The Client List)

Read the ballots here to see who else was submitted in this category. Thanks for reading! More coming soon! For more Emmy stuff, click here.

2013 Emmy Predictions (Top Contenders) – Lead Actress in a Comedy Series


tina fey 30 rock

Interestingly enough, there was a time when, before the actual nominations came out, voters would narrow down all the contenders to the “top 10″. They obviously don’t do that anymore. But…we can still assume which contenders are at the top of the voter’s minds. Before I release my official nomination predictions around early July, I am going to run down which 10 or so contenders are the biggest threats…and maybe some personal long shots that I believe voters should consider. Here we go!

(Yeah…I copied that opening paragraph from last season…deal with it.)

For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Here are the top Emmy contenders for Lead Actress in a Comedy Series. In alphabetical order…

1. portia de rossi (arrested development): PRO: She is the only person on this show who submitted in this category. So, if the voters decide to really embrace Arrested Development, then she might actually get swept up in the buzz. Yes, she’s never been nominated before…but she’s also never been given an entire episode to herself. CON: Still…she’s never been nominated before.

2. laura dern (enlightened): PRO: Despite its low ratings, Enlightened has become one of the most critically acclaimed shows of the year, topping many critics’ top 10 lists. Although she (shockingly) didn’t receive a nod last year, she is still a reliable Emmy favorite, having been nominated for 4 Emmys in the past for previous works. CON: Along with not being nominated last year when she was considered a front runner, the show was cancelled, which is never a good ingredient for Emmy consideration. I feel like fans of the show will fight for it…but it still may not be enough to convince stubborn Emmy voters.

3. zooey deschanel (the new girl): PRO: She received a nomination last year despite the mixed reviews. This season, fans of the show have definitely warmed up to Deschanel’s character. And I think the producers have reined her quirkiness more. She may have broader support this season. CON: …or maybe her nomination last year was a “one time thing” like Martha Plimpton…

4. lena dunham (girls): PRO: Both her and the show received a lot of Emmy nominations last year…but no wins. However, the show recovered when it dominated at the Golden Globes among other other awards. For better or worse, Girls gets a lot of buzz and reception and her name will be hard to ignore on the ballots. CON: I appreciated how bold this season was (even if I found the first season funnier)…but other people seem to think less of it. People either love the show or hate it. Also, not getting a SAG nomination could be a roadblock.

5. edie falco (nurse jackie): PRO: Edie Falco is an Emmy queen. She won 3 Emmys for The Sopranos. She won an additional Emmy for Nurse Jackie, and has been nominated every year since then. The nomination  for her and her co-star Merrit Weaver last year shows a continuing support for the show. CON: Similar to Girls and especially Enlightened, the show can be very dramatic with a very dry and dark sense of humor. With more comedic shows and performances still getting the wins, it’s harder for these types of dramedies to make an impression with voters, especially the older ones. Just an observation…

6. tina fey (30 rock): PRO: Tina Fey NEEDS one more nomination. She is one of the best television comedy actresses right now and it would be embarrassing if she were left off the top 6/7. There I said it! On top of that, she’s been nominated in this category for the last 6 years, winning for her second. She’ll get in. CON: She may get a nomination in the writing category instead…

7. mindy kaling (the mindy project): PRO: A funny leading debut for Mindy. She’s only gotten nominations for writing The Office, but voters like creator/star-types (like Tina Fey). Really, she’s the show’s best chance at a nomination. She could get her first nomination the same way fellow FOX star Zooey Deschanel got in. CON: The show’s been on since the fall, yet she hasn’t really gotten much. And reviews for the show seem more ambivalent than anything. Let’s just say, the network will have to do a LOT of campaigning.

8. julia louis-drefus (veep): PRO: She’s safe, c’mon! She’s won three Emmys (for three different shows) and bunch of other nominations for the seasons in between. Veep has been on fire this season and there’s really no reason why she could suddenly be left off. CON: No SAG nomination is the only thing I can think of.

9. melissa mccarthy (mike and molly): PRO: She won for her first season. She was nominated again last year. And during these last few months, she has become a big movie star, with Identity Thief becoming a huge success (commercially, not critically) and she has another movie with Sandra Bullock on the way. People love Melissa McCarthy and people will vote for her…even without checking out the show first. CON: It’s just interesting that the Emmys is the only major award show that acknowledges both her and the show. It’s a “Breaking Bad” sort of situation. What’s up with that???

10. martha plimpton (raising hope): PRO: She was nominated a couple years ago. While she didn’t receive a nomination last year, she still won an Emmy for a guest role on The Good Wife which shows some widespread support for the actress. She’s guaranteed another Guest Actress in a Drama Series nomination. But will that carry her back into Comedy consideration? CON: Probably not. We just have to admit to ourselves that Raising Hope is not an “Emmy show.” No shame in that. Good Times was never nominated for an Emmy and that show was/is dynomite!

11. amy poehler (parks and recreation): PRO: She’s been nominated the last three years. And she was arguably a front runner for the last 2, despite getting snubbed. The show may be off the radar, but I think Poehler will continue getting nominations, if only to see what funny thing she’ll plan for the ceremony. CON: It’s sad Poehler’s never won. Apparently, this season, she doesn’t have the same showcase she had with last year’s “Win, Lose, or Draw.” But that shouldn’t stop her. I think she’s safe.

Other strong contenders: Sutton Foster (Bunheads), Lea Michele (Glee), Mary Louise-Parker (Weeds)

Long shot worth considering: Patricia Heaton (The Middle)

Even longer shots I recommend checking out: Beth Behrs, Kat Dennings (2 Broke Girls), and Courtney Cox (Cougar Town). Also, I’d legitimately put Krysten Ritter (Don’t Trust the B) in my top 6. She’s hilarious and underrated on that show.

Read the ballots here to see who else was submitted in this category. Thanks for reading! More coming soon! For more Emmy stuff, click here.

2013 Emmy Predictions (Top Contenders) – Lead Actor in a Drama Series


house of cards kevin spacey

Interestingly enough, there was a time when, before the actual nominations came out, voters would narrow down all the contenders to the “top 10″. They obviously don’t do that anymore. But…we can still assume which contenders are at the top of the voter’s minds. Before I release my official nomination predictions around early July, I am going to run down which 10 or so contenders are the biggest threats…and maybe some personal long shots that I believe voters should consider. Here we go!

(Yeah…I copied that opening paragraph from last season…deal with it.)

For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Here are the top Emmy contenders for Lead Actor in a Drama Series. In alphabetical order…

1. hugh bonneville (downton abbey): PRO: He was (surprisingly) nominated last year. This season, his character dealt with a lot of things – from the (almost) loss of his estate to the death of his daughter. As an actor he had a lot to work with. CON: However, some may see the character as too unlikable (or even too stupid). And let’s be honest, last year, he was nominated mostly because of the overwhelming support for the show as a whole. If the show doesn’t get the same amount of support this season, he could easily be dropped out.

2. steve buscemi (boardwalk empire): PRO: These last three seasons, he’s been consistently nominated for all the big TV awards, including winning two SAG awards in the process. He’s an actor’s actor and I believe the industry respects him enough. CON: Is it just me (and I say this as someone who doesn’t watch the show regularly) or has this show been overshadowed by Breaking Bad and Homeland? Just sayin’…

3. bryan cranston (breaking bad): PRO: Three Emmys out of four nominations…and he just received his first SAG award this year.  This season was highly acclaimed and we’re all anticipating the second half of the last season in the process. I think it’s safe to say he’ll get nominated this year and last year too…he may even win again in the process. On a personal note, in my opinion, he gives one the best performances on TV. CON: Hey! Even James Gandolfini missed a year during his Sopranos run. Anything can happen!

4. jeff daniels (the newsroom): PRO: He’s actually never been nominated for any Emmys for his previous work. However, so far, for The Newsroom, he’s gotten a nominated for the Satellite, The Golden Globes, and the SAGs. All signs lead to “Emmy.” If voters watched only the pilot (like I have), he could still get in based on his fiery performance in that episode. CON: The Newsroom has gotten some pretty nasty reviews from critics (and even audiences). The whole show, including Daniels, could be snubbed.

5. michael c. hall (dexter): PRO: Last year, against all odds, despite scathing reviews for the season, Michael C. Hall still received a nomination. He received it over Hugh Laurie for his last season of House and presumed front runner Kelsey Grammar for Boss. That is how much voters like Michael C. Hall. This last season hasn’t gotten better reviews so, technically, it should be safe, right? CON: Something in my blood tells me this category will be shook up. This category is TOO competitive this year with too many new contenders for voters to give Hall his 6th nomination (without a win). But…I think I said the same thing last year so what do I know?

6. jon hamm (mad men): PRO: The season isn’t over yet, but, so far, I think Hamm has done enough to warrant another nomination. He’s an Emmy favorite. He’ll probably get nominated for 30 Rock again…even if he didn’t appear in any episodes. CON: Is Mad Men losing stock? The show got no wins last year. Hamm has never won an Emmy. Even newcomer Damien Lewis beat him last year. Will there be a time when voters will stop nominating Hamm altogether?

7. damien lewis (homeland): PRO: Damien Lewis, IMO, gives a tour-de-force performance. And he impressed me more this season than he did last season when he actually won. He deserves another nomination this year, maybe even a second Emmy. CON: Homeland got a lot of flack this year (mostly the second half of the season). And not everyone loves Lewis’s performance. But, again, this is a “critics vs. regular people vs. industry” situation.

8. andrew lincoln (the walking dead): PRO: I am the only person in America who doesn’t watch this show. Seriously, this show gets ratings that broadcast networks would die for. Even if this show isn’t really a reliable awards favorite, this wouldn’t be the first time an actor has received an Emmy nomination after a few seasons, especially when the critical reception for the show is getting warmer. CON: But, again, the show isn’t a reliable awards favorite. And besides a couple Saturn Award nominations, Lincoln has never been nominated for anything significant (SAGs and Golden Globes, etc.)

9. timothy olyphant (justified): PRO: As the rough and tough deputy, he earned a nomination for the show’s second season when the show was receiving a lot of Margo Martindale related buzz. He hasn’t gotten nominated for much since then, but he is still a top contender because he and the show still receives a lot of acclaim. CON: He wasn’t nominated last year. You know the old Emmy rule: “Once you’re out, you’re out forever!”

10. matthew rhys (the americans): PRO: This is a very new show that hasn’t had much of a chance to pick awards steam. However, Matthew Rhys just received a TCA nomination, and Critics Choice nomination, and tons of critical acclaim. CONS: You’d have to be ballsy to put him in your final top 6 (esp. considering everyone nominated last year is eligible this year). But predict him if you must.

11. kevin spacey (house of cards): PRO: Like Rhys, he’s on a very new show that has gotten some really nice critical notice. Unlike Rhys, he is a terribly established actor with two Oscars and a couple Emmy nominations for previous works. After three episodes, I found the show a little boring to be honest, but I found his performance invigorating and droll. CON: If this show had premiered on traditional television and not the internet, I’d probably be more confident of his chances.

Other strong contenders: Kevin Bacon (The Following), Andre Braugher (Last Resort), Hugh Dancy (Hannibal), Michael Emerson (Person of Interest),

Long shots worth considering: Patrick J. Adams (Suits), Simon Baker (The Mentalist), Kelsey Grammer (Boss), Charlie Hunnam (Sons of Anarchy), Jeremy Irons (The Borgias), Peter Krause (Parenthood), Gabriel Macht (Suits), William H. Macy (Shameless), Jonny Lee Miller (Sherlock)

Read the ballots here to see who else was submitted in this category. Thanks for reading! More coming soon! For more Emmy stuff, click here.

2013 Emmy Predictions (Top Contenders) – Lead Actor in a Comedy Series


charlie sheen anger management

Interestingly enough, there was a time when, before the actual nominations came out, voters would narrow down all the contenders to the “top 10″. They obviously don’t do that anymore. But…we can still assume which contenders are at the top of the voter’s minds. Before I release my official nomination predictions around early July, I am going to run down which 10 or so contenders are the biggest threats…and maybe some personal long shots that I believe voters should consider. Here we go!

(Yeah…I copied that opening paragraph from last season…deal with it.)

For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Here are the top Emmy contenders for Lead Actor in a Comedy Series. In alphabetical order…

1. alec baldwin (30 rock)PRO: He was nominated for the first 6 seasons of the show…there’s no reason he shouldn’t be nominated for the 7th (esp. considering it’s the last season.) He already has two Emmys on his shelf. CON: Out with the old, in with the…”not as old”? Maybe?

2. jason bateman (arrested development): PRO: Big movie star is back for Emmy contention. He was nominated for the show’s second season, so voters clearly like him in this role. CON: Despite the hype, this wasn’t the most critically acclaimed season of comedy. Considering he’s only been nominated once, maybe voters don’t like him that much.

3. louis ck (louie): PRO: He’s been nominated the last two years (for the show’s first two seasons of course). He won two Emmys last year for writing and for his variety special. I honestly don’t know a single person who dislikes him or the show. CON: It’s a little strange that the actual show has never been nominated for Comedy Series. So, who knows what the voters are thinking??

4. don cheadle (house of lies): PRO: He was nominated last year. He won a Golden Globe this year. He is a solid lead in an overall solid show. CON: This just isn’t a show that’s talked about much. Now saying that Cheadle isn’t deserving of a nomination…but his imminent nod mostly hang on “name recognition” tbh.

5. jon cryer (two and a half men): PRO: A bitch load of nominations. Two wins (one for supporting and one for leading last year). High ratings. High salary. God…I wish I had his life. CON: I don’t know. He is literally the new Tony Shalhoub. Maybe the small bit of backlash from his win last year may make voters rethink things (like when Kyra Sedwick was snubbed a couple years ago the year after shockingly beating Julianna Margulies).

6. johnny galecki (the big bang theory): PRO: Yeah, he was snubbed last year (after getting a nomination the year before). But it just seems like the show’s ratings are getting higher and higher. He could sneak back in. CON: Between him and Jim Parsons, Jim Parsons will always have the edge…by a significant margin. Johnny Galecki is not getting a nomination without Parsons.

7. jake johnson (new girl): PRO: If last year was the year of Schmidt, this was the year of Nick Miller. He has consistently become one of the most entertaining and endearing things about New Girl. And with a recent TCA nomination under his belt, he has officially become the strongest “new contender” in this category CON: Although moving to Lead might have been a strategic way to avoid competing against last year nominee Max Greenfield…it might also be a hurdle considering Zooey Deschanel is the “true lead” of the show.

8. matt leblanc (episodes): PRO: His show wasn’t eligible last year, but he was nominated the year before. He also won a Golden Globe for this award. And the second season got a lot of acclaim, even more so than the first season. CON: However, as much as I love this show and his performance, I still see this as a toss up. A lot has happened since the second season finished. Have the voters remembered enough?

9. jim parson (the big bang theory): PRO: The two-time Emmy winner is male MVP of a comedy series that gets higher ratings than Amercan Idol. Any questions? CON: This last season hasn’t been the most acclaimed (I wouldn’t know personally because I didn’t watch the show this season). I could reasonably see the voters dropping Parsons “Charle Sheen-style.” Speaking of Charlie Sheen,,,

10. charlie sheen (anger management): PRO: This is the first year the show has been eligible, but Charlie Sheen was nominated four times in a row for Two and a Half Men before the voters (and the show itself later) cut him off. The show has crazily high ratings (for cable) and a 90 episode renewal (something I thought was only reserved for Tyler Perry). He is technically an Emmy favorite and contender, even if the show gets a “meh” critical reception. CON: His show is popular with regular people, but does the “industry” like him? I’m not sure if the people voting for Jon Cryer would also add Charlie Sheen to their ballot.

Other strong contenders: Tim Allen (Last Man Standing),  Billy Gardell (Mike and Molly), Ashton Kutcher (Two and a Half Men), Adam Scott (Parks and Recreation)

Long shots worth considering: Rob Corddry (Children’s Hospital), Garrett Dillahunt (Raising Hope), David Duchovny (Californication), Rob Lowe (Parks and Recreation), Joel McHale (Community), Matthew Morrison (Glee), Matthew Perry (Go On), Elijah Wood (Wilfred)

Even longer shots I recommend checking out: Justin Bartha and Andrew Rannells (The New Normal). They have no chance in hell, but I love them both anyway!

Read the ballots here to see who else was submitted in this category. Thanks for reading! More coming soon! For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Unassuming Euonym’s 2013 Emmy Center


This is the place where I’ll make predictions, review submissions, and do anything else Emmy-related (actually, those two first things might be it but…still…worth the read.) Bookmark this page and check back regularly for updates.

REVIEWING THE BALLOTS: TOP CONTENDERS

Lead Actor in a Comedy Series

Lead Actor in a Drama Series

Lead Actress in a Comedy Series

Lead Actress in a Drama Series

Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series

Supporting Actor in a Drama Series

Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series

More coming soon…

EMMY TALK

The “Locks”

2013 Tony Awards Recap (The Moments that Rocked!)


2013 tonys

I gotta say, of the big four (EGOT), the Tonys are, and have always been, my favorite award ceremony. Is it the musical performances? Yes. Is it Neil Patrick Harris who has become a Tony award staple? Yeah. But…it’s also the fact that as much as I love theatre, I haven’t seen any of these shows. So not only is this show a great way to introduce to me to great New York theatre, but I can confidently say I can’t get upset when a “favorite” (if I even have one) loses because…unlike the Oscars or the Emmys or the Grammys…I HAVEN’T SEEN ANY OF THE SHOWS SO I CAN’T PROPERLY JUDGE! YAY!!!

But, I can still list some of my favorite moments from the entire evening. And there were a lot because, wow, this was the best Tony ceremony from the last few years. Very few sound issues. A couple great speeches (with a couple surprising wins). And Neil…wow. Just when I though having him as a host for a fourth time wasn’t a great idea, he proves me wrong and outdoes himself yet again. Can he PLEASE host the Oscars next year? Anyway…let’s do this:

    • THE OPENING: What can I say? It was spectacular. An ode to all the musicals (sorry plays) that are still on Broadway. We saw the Newsies. We saw those bird puppets from The Lion King. We saw A LOT of kids (more on that later). We saw Neil sing really fast and dance and disappear before out very eyes. I think…this was my favorite opening of all time. It was a nice way to incorporate all the shows without doing an awkwardly edited medley. NPH (and his team) are always creative like that.
    • a christmas story tony
    • THE KIDS: We got a lot performances from the kid performers on Broadway. We started with a performance by the cast of Matilda“Revolting Children” is such a spirited number and I’m always in awe of the spirit and choreography when watching it. You can tell the cast has such a fun time performing it. By the end of “When I Grow Up,” all four actresses who played Matilda take the stage to sing a snippet reprise of “Naughty.” And then we got a performance from the kid cast of Annie, led by unfairly and criminally snubbed Lilla Crawford (OK, the only nomination snub that made me upset). They performed “It’s a Hard Knock Life.” I have a soft spot for both this musical and its revival so I’m glad it at least got this Revival nomination so they were able to perform, even if they had no chance of beating Pippin or even Cinderella. Unfortunately these little girls were interrupted by Jane Lynch who played Miss Hannigan. Jane Lynch does a good job but…it seemed like a way to sell tickets to the Glee crowd. I would have preferred a performance of “You’re Never Fully Dressed” instead. Lastly, we got a performance from the kid cast of A Christmas Story. Believe it or not, this was my favorite performance of the evening. Johnny Rabe as Ralphie was great, but that little tapper dude (Luke Spring) stole the entire night with that wonderful tap solo. All the kids in the number were wonderful at tapping. And while, having not been familiar with the movie, I didn’t quite understand what was going on, I still smiled the whole way through. Great job to all the kids!!!

cinderella cinderella cinderella

    • OTHER STRONG PERFORMANCES: I can’t say I fully understood what was going on during the Bring it On performance, but by time they got to what I think was the chorus of the song, I was definitely feeling it. Apparently Lin-Manuel Miranda co-wrote the book and lyrics which is no surprise considering how similar the rap is to the raps in In the Heights. It was a cool performance for a show that I wanted to see last year. Unfortunately, it had a short run. Cinderella was awesome mostly because of the cool quick costume changes done by Broadway’s future Laura Osnes and the always fabulous Victoria Clark (“You’d be surprised how many beautiful gowns have crazy women in them!”) who play Cinderella and Fairy Godmother respectively. William Ivey Long definitely deserved his Costume Tony (the only award the musical won that night.) And, despite the fact the high grossing show wasn’t nominated for Best Musical, Motown: The Musical  was still able to churn out a couple dance numbers. I especially liked the performance of another child star, Raymond Luke Jr., as young Michael of the Jackson 5. I love this music so I was really digging it. 
    • WOMEN DIRECTORS: For the first time since 1998, two women directors won for both Best Direction of Musical and Play. First, Diane Paulus won for directing the beautiful and lavish Pippin. Her speech was very heartfelt and articulate, and she especially paid tribute to the great Stephen Schwartz. And then Pam MacKinnon won for Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf. She started her speech by going, “So…Vegas got this one wrong…an Diane Paulus’s speech was fantastic. Um…so that’s where my head is.” Who run the world!

laura benanti tony

    • BROADWAY STARS ON CANCELLED TV SHOWS: While Andrew Rannells, Megan Hilty, and Tony winner Laura Benanti are all Broadway favorites, on the small screen, they aren’t quite as successful. So the three of them (joined by a smug NPH) sang their woes about being on cancelled (NBC) TV series. Laura Benanti (to the tune of “Ladies Who Lunch”) is especially depressed about being on TWO cancelled TV series. It was one of the funniest moments of the night and showed how talented each of them (esp. Megan Hilty wowza) are! If it’s any consolation, I loved The New Normal,  “mildly” kept up with Smash, and…well…I didn’t watch Go On but I heard a lot of great things about it and I was a little surprised that NBC cancelled that one TBH.
    • JESSE EISENBERG AND THE PLAYS: He introduced the nominated plays…and in record speed. I love Jesse Eisenberg. I love how he can’t keep his jittery body still. I love his speedy voice. Also, you all should watch Now You See Me. Anyway, Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike won Best Play. Judging by the little snippets of each play, and the fact that I’ve loved reading all the other Christopher Durang plays, I think the Theatre Wing made the right choice.

pippin revival tony

    • PIPPIN: Pippin  was one of three musicals who dominated the night with four Tonys, including Best Revival and Direction. Andrea Martin won for Best Featured Actress, while Patina Miller won for Leading Actress in the same role that won Ben Vereen a Tony 40 years ago. (Is this the first time two people of different genders won a Tony for the same role?) Patina Miller dominated with a great acceptance speech and a great leading performance in “Magic to Do” with the rest of the spirited cast. However, I’m not going to leave out Matthew James Thomas who did a good job with “Corner of the Sky” in the usually thankless leading titular role. I have to say I love this interpretation of Pippin. The carnival aspect of the show definitely took me by surprise when I first watched the previews. The original production was definitely a lot subtler and simplistic (in an effective way of course). But, theatre is about embracing different interpretations, not clinging on to the old productions. So, I believe what Diane Paulus and her team did with this was excellent and made sense. And, honestly, such a great, talented company. I can’t wait to watch this on bootleg!

kinky boots tony

    • KINKY BOOTS: When most people, including myself, began watching the Tonys, we expected the British import Matilda to dominate the same way Billy Elliot did. However, that wasn’t the case. Yes, Matilda still won 4 Tonys, but it was the supposed dark horse Kinky Boots that took the top honor Best Musical. This sort of surprise just made the night more exciting. And judging from other performances the cast has given on other shows and their performance of “Everybody Say Yeah” (which featured some cool treadmill choreography) tonight, I think this was a just win. Cyndi Lauper won Best Score, and looked so grateful and tearful accepting her award. It’s nice to see this global superstar so humble and gracious. Billy Porter won Lead Actor and gave one the strongest speeches of the night. (“I want to thank…my mother…you are the personification of true Christianity. Your willingness to embrace that which you don’t understand with unconditional love is a template that the world could benefit from employing. Your courage gives me life and I love you!”) It was a good night for the musical that will surely get a boost in ticket sales. The best part about all this is reading the bitter British presses try to bash Kinky Boots. Nice try.

cicely tyson tony

    • CICELY TYSON: And the award for the greatest speech in the history of awards goes to…the great Cicely Tyson. Let’s walk through this piece by piece. The nominations are called. Tyson is clearly nervous. She wants this. She wants this bad. Her name is called. The crowd goes wild. Most jump to their feet. Cecily stays seated, trying to take it all in. She finally stands, revealing a dress that’s made of nothing but extravagant purple ruffles. The announcer reveals that this is her FIRST Tony nomination and win. It takes her like 5 minutes to reach the stage. She gets a rousing standing ovation in the process. She reaches the mic, not holding the trophy. And she gives her speech in a slow, thoughtful delivery, with plenty of conviction. She takes in the moment. She starts out by talking about herself in the third person. She talks about how she’s last living member of her immediate family. She talks about how it’s been thirty years since she’s done stage work. She didn’t think it would happen again in her lifetime…but she had this burning to desire to just have “one more. One more great role, I said. I didn’t want to be greedy. I just wanted one more!” The audience laughs to this. She thanks the American Theatre Wing for welcoming her home. She takes a long pause before the music comes in. I’m already buying my ticket so I can fly to New York to murder the conductor that decided to play this living legend off. But then she recovers like the pro she is. “Please wrap it, they say…Well that’s exactly what you did with me. You wrapped me up in your arms after 30 years. And now I can go home with a Tony!” She thanks the crowd and they give her another standing ovation. A great moment of television and probably my favorite of the year so far. I still have tears in my eyes. Now, how about we give her one more great movie role, so she can win an Oscar! (And, going off of that, let’s give Cyndi Lauper an Oscar so she can complete her EGOT!)
    • EMPIRE STATE OF MIND: The show ends with NPH doing his usual “recap” of the show with lyrics that were probably written a mere minutes before it happened. He rapped it to Jay-Z’s “Empire State of Mind” with Audra McDonald singing the chorus. Even when she’s not nominated, she’s still fabulous. She ends with a gif-worthy mic drop.

Overall, this was a great night filled with wonderful performances and funny bits in between. I think the only I didn’t like was the characters from previous musical introducing the newer musicals’ performances. (Like Spiderman…I didn’t get that.) But, otherwise, the Tonys prove why it’s better than the other award shows out there. Thanks for reading!

Season 38 Saturday Night Live Top 10 Best Sketches!


justin bieber snl grease

For the formal introduction and some other great sketches that didn’t make my top 10, click here.

OK…here it goes. These are the ten sketches of season 38 that never fails to make me laugh. Even after I’ve watched them 20 times in a row, I still find something hilarious about them. Without further ado…

I took the links from Hulu…so…sorry, Canadians.

10. Bravo Spin-offs (Justin Bieber) - This commercial parody makes fun of all the spin off reality shows Bravo produces. Funny all around, but my favorite part is the show featuring Francis Ford Coppola…’s granddaughter…s’ best friends. “Our best friends’ father my have directed Apocalypse Now…” “But we’re sluts.” ALWAYS gets me.

9. Bieber Doubles (Justin Bieber) - “I mean, some of them are black. They’re not fooling anybody.” “Yeah, well neither are you, homey.” Dead. Unfortunately, this clip isn’t available legally online because of copyright issues, but I still urge you to check it out. (Even if you love Justin Bieber, this sketch works for everybody.)

8. Grease (Justin Bieber) - I am in no way a fan of Justin Bieber’s music, but I have to admit, his episode was one of my favorites of the season. I think it mostly has to do with the fact that a high concentration of sketches featured lot of cast members (or even the entire cast like the Bieber Doubles sketch). Also, I guess I’m a sucker for musical parodies (“Say More Stuff” just seems like a funny way of saying “Tell Me More.”) So I suppose this sketch completely worked for me. “Wait, where did you meet him again?” “Let’s just say he was hanging out with the kids I babysit…” “Aren’t you saying that?” – I love Vanessa Bayer’s delivery.

7. The Sopranos Diaries (Adam Levine) - Just a very fun sketch featuring one of my favorite shows of all time. Bobby Moynihan does a very good job channeling a younger Tony Sopranos, while Kate McKinnon, once again, perfects her Edie Falco impression. Maybe next they can do “The Mad Men Diaries” (still set in the 80′s of course).

6. History of Punk (Vince Vaughn) - Fred Armisen, especially after older players like Jimmy Fallon and Darrell Hammond left, developed a voice on the show that was remarkably different from the other cast members. He’s sort of like Kristen Wiig – he was never afraid of looking silly or weird. While this sketch definitely has a weird quality about it, it get’s surprisingly sweet and poignant at times.  SNL could have written a sketch (tastelessly) ripping apart Margaret Thatcher. Instead, they created this strangely neutral sketch that would probably please people on both sides of the argument. This sketch is very well made that features some very funny songs. And Fred Armisen’s English accent – Jesus, hilarious!

5. Puppetry Class (Seth MacFarlane) - I definitely think this is a classic…a specific sketch people remember for years and years to come. What is it about this sketch? Seth MacFarlane’s impressive array of voices? Kenan’s “Can I change that voice” moments? Vanessa doing her Vanessa thing? I think it was mostly Bill Hader’s wonderful performance as a soldier vet suffering from PTSD and is expressing intense feelings through his puppet. I think the moment we see cigarette smoke come out the puppet is the moment when this sketch becomes the real freakin’ deal! I’m going to miss Hader…but at least he left this show with such a memorable sketch and character (a character we thankfully only saw once.)

4. Outside the Lines (Melissa McCarthy) - I hope Melissa McCarthy joins the five-timers club soon because she’s definitely one of the liveliest, funniest hosts in recent memory. If her material doesn’t work all the time, McCarthy at least commits to it 100% and makes the sketch, at least, watchable. This is one of those sketches that was not only well written, but also featured my favorite performance from Melissa McCarthy on this show. She plays the college basketball coach from hell – someone who makes even Mike Rice look nice. She uses everything from bricks,  to tasers, to toasters to intimidate her players. McCarthy is absolutely wild AS this coach and I love it!

3. Former Porn Stars Selling Stuff (Various Episodes) - I gotta say…I think Vanessa Bayer can be overlooked sometime. Even from sympathetic people who tend to go “Awww, Vanessa Bayer doesn’t appear in enough sketches.” But honestly, she’s created a nice bundle of recurring characters: Miley Cyrus, best friends of dictators with Fred Armisen, Japanese talk show, Fox and Friends, and Jacob the Jewish kid among other characters. She’s made her mark on this show and judging from this latest addition to her canon, she still has plenty of ideas left. Cecily Strong and Bayer have truly created one of the filthiest, most hilariously shocking recurring sketches in recent memory. This idea shouldn’t work…but it does anyway. And they both play off each other very well as two drugged up former porn sluts trying to sell stuff.

Here are some of my favorite quotes from these sketches…

Swarovski Crystals

  • Vanessa: “Diamonds are too expensive and heavy. No thanks, Jose.” / Cecily: “Crystals are light and fifty dollars. Plus, they’re diamonds. And they’re perfect for…Crystals.
  • Vanessa: “I lost part of my foot. It broke off in a butt. And I’ve regrettered it ever since. But I don’t regret wearing crystals.”
  • Cecily: “One time, I thought I was asleep; but I was just drug-dead. Then I noticed a Swarovski Crystal on my wrist and I thought, “Okay!”
  • Sammy Stamina: “Because there’s one thing that never goes out of style.” / Vanessa: “Crystals.” / Cecily: (at the same time) “ANAL!”
  • Cecily and Vanessa: “Swarovski Crystals! Ooh, we’re covered in this stuff! Luxury, that is! And the “Ooh” wasn’t gross, it was like, Ohhh…

Moet & Chandon

  • Cecily: “…and it’s perfect for occasions like…” / Vanessa: “Promotion.” / Cecily: “Occasions.” / Vanessa: “Successful Surgery.” / Cecily: “Bubbles.” / Vanessa: “Avernersary.”
  • Cecily: “You’ll think you just graduated magnum cum loudly.”
  • Cecily: “One time, I did a weird shoot in Mexico. Two of the girls disappeared but I’m alive. Thanks champagne!”
  • Vanessa: “I sprained my wrist jerking off a horse…”
  • Ricky VIPenis: “And if you want to treat a lady right, you’ll buy her Monica and Chandler champagne.”
  • Ricky VIPenis: “And to my old gym teacher who said, ‘you’ll never do pornos!’ Why would you say that to a twelve year old?”
  • Ricky VIPenis: “‘Cause the best gift you can give a loved one is…” / Vanessa: “Champagne.” / Cecily: (at the same time) “ORAL!”

Hermes Handbags

  • Cecily: “It’s perfect for occasions like…” / Vanessa: “Everyday.” / Cecily: “Business Lunch.” / Vanessa: “Carrying.” / Cecily: “Caesarian Sections.” / Vanessa: “And eating breakfast off Tiffany.”
  • Cecily: “ One time I got banged through a glass ceiling. I changed everything for women. Turns out I’m a feminist. Thanks, Herman’s!”
  • Also Girth Brooks…is apparently the name of a real life porn star. Go figure!

I feel dirty watching these sketches again. I need a shower. Great work, ladies!

2. Girl You Wish You Hadn’t Started a Conversation with at Party (Various Episodes) - While it took Aidy Bryant and Tim Robinson some time before they really made a presence on this show, Cecily Strong seemed to fit right in since the beginning. I still enjoy the first sketch she did, in which she played a Hispanic woman urging latinos to vote. However, it is her “Girl You Wish” character that has really turned her into a force to be reckoned with in the comedy world. This was my “Stefon.” This was my “Drunk Uncle.” This was the Weekend Update character I always looked forward to and enjoyed. Cecily Strong plays a  girl at a party who just randomly (or drunkenly) sprouts out ridiculous political statements that make no sense. Cecily peppers her delivery with mispronunciations (I guess similar to her Former pornstar character) and semi-racist epithets. This was my favorite recurring character of the year and I truly believe Cecily Strong deserves to be upgraded to the main cast next season (as opposed to the standard two year wait).

Here are some of my favorite moments from her FOUR appearances…

Weekend Update Thursday

  • Girl getting out her cellphone…
  • Girl: “Like are we better than them? Are you better than them, Seth?” / Seth: “Better than who?” / Girl: “It’s whom, Seth.”
  • Girl: “Open your eyes, people! WAR, HUNGER, DISEASES — it’s like, pick one!
  • Girl: “Like if I eat french fries at dinner then I do the rest of the date good…”
  • Girl: “You know what I hate? Posters.” / Seth: “I’m sorry?” / Girl: “Possters…” / Seth: “Are you saying posers or posters?”
  • Girl: “Seth, can I use the N-word real quick?”

Louis CK  (I think this is a dress rehearsal version but still amazing)

  • Girl: “You are so afraid of everyone thinks of you. And you’re judging them? You should be ashame?”
  • Girl: “You’re brainwatch…OPEN YOUR EYES, PEOPLE! Hunger! Racism! Small businesses! It’s like, maybe don’t!”
  • Girl: “OK, you know what I love most, Seth? Benefiz.” / Seth: “Benefits?” / Girl: “Bennifer.” / Seth: “Bennifer?! You love Bennifer?”
  • Girl: “What were you for Halloween…I was Malcolm X.” / Seth: “So…you went in blackface?” / Girl: “Wow! It’s African American face and, yah, of course I did!”

Martin Short

  • Girl: “Hey Seth! Welcome back…”
  • Girl: “There are homeless people out there who can’t even pay their mortgages! Is that what George Washington had in mind when he started ‘merica? It’s like read something, Seth. Learn a book!”
  • Girl: “Fact! For every five people who are hungry, there are five people who are too full. It’s like, switch stomachs!”
  • Girl: “I’m sorry. Why can’t Secret Santa just be openly gay?! Like, hello, it’s 2010.”
  • Girl: “…what you want for Christmas?” / Seth: “OK, well I was hoping to get the new iPad.” / Girl: “I asked for an end to genocide. OK. So maybe next time you’re on your new iPad, look up how to be a decent human being.”
  • Girl: “It’s origami…that’s Spanish for goose.

Zach Galifinakis

  • Girl: “Don’t believe everything you read on TV, Seth. There are 90 year olds dying every single day. It’s like, Oh thanks, Congress!”
  • Girl: “Guess what? They’re coming to America whether you like it or not.” / Seth: “Who’s coming?” / Girl: “Secadas, Seth!”
  • Girl: “I printed out my Facebook statuses from the last six years.”

1. Cecilia Gimenez (Daniel Craig) - I’ve probably watched this sketch at least 50 times. I plan on discussing my love of Kate McKinnon in the next post…but, right now, all I can say is that with every new viewing, I find something LOL funny. Whether it is “Give my money, I want to be wine!” or “Jesus, why you look like a shark?” or “Jelly roll scroll.” Kate McKinnon’s delivery and mannerisms are just works of genius. I usually don’t put Weekend Update spots in my top 20 (as a general rule because they aren’t technically sketches), but between this spot and the “Girl You Wish…” series, I couldn’t resist.

Hm…the top 3 sketches involve female cast members. Take the hint, writers. Feature them in more sketches! Stop the “put men in dresses” stint…unless we’re dealing with Fred Armisen…which we won’t after this season so you can stop all together!

Also, hire a black actress, MADtv-style.

Anyway…I still have one more SNL related sketch to go so…if you love SNL, then you want to miss it. Thanks for reading!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.