Archive for the ‘ emmys ’ Category

2013 Emmy Predictions (Top Contenders) – Supporting Actress in a Drama Series


downton abbey elizabeth mcgovern

Interestingly enough, there was a time when, before the actual nominations came out, voters would narrow down all the contenders to the “top 10″. They obviously don’t do that anymore. But…we can still assume which contenders are at the top of the voter’s minds. Before I release my official nomination predictions around early July, I am going to run down which 10 or so contenders are the biggest threats…and maybe some personal long shots that I believe voters should consider. Here we go!

(Yeah…I copied that opening paragraph from last season…deal with it.)

For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Here are the top Emmy contenders for Supporting Actress in a Drama Series. In alphabetical order…

Similar to “Supporting Actor in a Drama Series,” this is also an especially tough category to pin down and I went back and forth with a lot of these contenders, but, ultimately, I chose a whopping 16 actresses I think had the best chance at getting a nomination this year. Here we go!

1. morena baccarin (homeland): PRO: Last year, Homeland surprised everyone by winning Drama Series and the two lead acting races. With so much momentum coming into this year, Homeland could probably pick up a few more acting nominations. Besides Mandy Patinkin, Morena has the best chance at benefiting from this momentum for her overall strong performance on the show. Her character certainly had a lot to do this season. Voters like these “wife of monster” roles (see Anna Gunn or even January Jones during her prime). CON: Besides an Ensemble Award at this year’s SAG, she hasn’t gotten any recognition for this role. It is hard for her to make a name for herself against the heavy hitters (Danes, Lewis, Patinkin) right beside her.

2. christine baranski (the good wife): PRO: A perennial Emmy favorite, she has consistently gotten nominations for various programs since her first (and only) win in 1995 for Cybill. She has received nominations the last three years for The Good Wife. Although, sometimes it seems like she’s (unfortunately) underused on the show, other times, she is given stuff to work with, including dealing with her law firm’s financial problems and considering a political career. There are definitely some stand out episodes she could submit if nominated. CON: It’s a toughie. After the show itself was left out of the Drama Series race, how long will the Emmys continue nominating TWO supporting actresses from a show they’ve stopped loving? Similar to what happened to Oh and Wilson for Grey’s Anatomy, I could see the voters dropping both Baranski and Panjabi in one cruel swipe.

3. rose byrne (damages): PRO: Although snubbed last year, she was nominated for the two eligible years before  then. It being the show’s last season, Byrne could be invited back to the race, especially if voters watched either the series finale or “The Storm’s Moving In.” CON: Damages used to be a reliable Emmy force…but ever since it moved to DirecTV, only Glenn Close seems to still be getting notice, and even she’s not a complete lock this year. If Byrne couldn’t get in last year with Bridesmaids possibly working in her favor, I don’t much see her getting in this year.

4. laura carmicheal (downtom abbey): PRO: As the “homely” middle child, Edith, she had her share of ups and downs…and downs. In the beginning of the season, she’s preparing for her wedding. And then she’s dumped at the altar. And then she falls into a deep depression. And then she discovers her love of writing. And then she meets another man…and seems to be falling in love…until it’s revealed that the man is still married and is unable to get a proper divorce. This season, viewers were actually able to relate to Edith and feel sympathy for her at the same time. This is the first year Carmichael would actually deserve a nomination. CON: No previous nominations. No other work outside of Downton Abbey. Only her performance will help her…assuming the voters actually liked it.

5. emilia clarke (game of thrones): PRO: This is tough for me because I know virtually nothing about this show or her character. In fact…I can’t even remember her from the three episodes I’ve watched from previous seasons. So…I don’t know much about her character or what about her character that would make it Emmy bait. However, I do know that year after year people single her performance out and this year seems to be no different. She was nominated for a Monte-Carlo award last year and a Critics Choice Award this year. Maybe it’s time for someone besides Peter Dinklage to get a nomination. CON: I think after two seasons of snubs, maybe (because this is a fantastical world) voters just can’t take the performances too seriously. Maybe it’s the type of show where they appreciate the world and the direction and the writing and even the characters…but not necessarily the actors behind the characters (except “MVP” Peter Dinklage.)

6. michelle fairley (game of thrones): PRO: Same sitch as Clarke. I know very little. However…I did watch the last few minutes of “The Rains of Castamere” since everyone was talking about it. Clearly, Fairley will no longer be a cast member on the show after the episode, which could lead to some sentimental votes a la Jared Harris (this isn’t a slight against them of course.) Fairley also drew a lot of praise for her performance in the episode. I actually believe out of all the supporting female performances on the show, she has the best chance at sneaking into an Emmy race. CON: Does that mean I’m predicting her? I’m not sure yet. Like I mentioned above…voters seem to only appreciate Peter Dinklage.

7. joanne froggatt (downton abbey): PRO: Last season, Froggatt received a semi-surprising nomination for portrayal as Anna, a woman who is trying to fight for her husband’s release from prison. This season we saw even more of that. I can’t say I was terribly captivated by her story line (in fact, many times I found it a drag), but I still admire her performance. CON: She’s not going to get a nomination over Maggie Smith. However, if voters decide to nominated two actresses from the show again in this category, then she has a chance at repeating.

8. anna gunn (breaking bad): PRO: It took a couple years (and a switch to supporting), but Anna Gunn finally received a deserved nomination for Breaking Bad last year. Despite a shortened “half season,” Anna Gunn still had plenty to do, especially in her showcase episode “Fifty-One” (which I’m assuming will be her tape). CON: Do people still find the character unlikable? Or have we finally realized that maybe Skyler had a point the entire time? Anyway, I can’t really think of a “Con.”

9. christina hendricks (mad men): PRO: With three previous nominations, Hendricks has become sort of a reliable tent pole in the category. Mad Men does well with getting a lot acting nominations, and Hendricks has the best shot in getting into this category out of all the other actresses on her show that also submitted in this category. CON: This has been a pretty light season for Hendricks, especially compared to season 5. If she couldn’t win last year when she had at least 2 or 3 strong tape possibilities, she probably can’t win this year.

10. kate mara (house of cards): PRO: Buzz. A lot of buzz. Mara’s been in the business for a while (Brokeback Mountain), but this is her first really critically acclaimed role. Similar to Archie Panjabi when she was first nominated (and won), I could see voters congratulating the fresh faced Mara with a nomination, and maybe even a surprise win. CON: It depends on how well the voters will embrace this online series.

11. elizabeth mcgovern (downton abbey): PRO: She received a Lead Actress nomination a couple years ago when the series erroneously competed in “Miniseries/Movie.” Last year, she was passed on in favor of Michelle Dockery in Lead Actress in a Drama Series. This year, with her role becoming less prominent, she opted to compete in Supporting which, IMO, is a nice strategy and increases her chances. This season, from her husband almost losing the estate to her daughters’ marriage issues, she was the calming, American presence throughout the halls of Downton Abbey. Other times, we got some real intense emotion from her, like when Sybill tragically passed away. This was truly McGovern’s strongest season. CON: Did I say her screen time became less prominent? I meant, she has practically become a “featured actress” on the show. When Shirley MacLaine visited as Cora’s mother, you think this would be the opportunity to give Cora something to do and give her her own conflict. Instead, she was an afterthought during that whole debacle. Her limited screen time will ultimately be the thing that will keep her from a nomination despite, in my opinion, a great standout performance.

12. hayden panettiere (nashville): PRO: Nashville has become a breakout network hit, and Panettiere has definitely gotten some buzz and notice since the show’s debut. From dealing with a deadbeat mom to shoplifting to a marriage gone wrong, Juliette Barnes has become one television’s most interesting characters. And Hayden has played her well, becoming my personal favorite thing about the show. She was also nominated for a Golden Globe last winter. CON: While the ratings for the show are steady, Emmy buzz for the show has waned, especially with the introduction of newer cable shows. If the show doesn’t get widespread broad support, Panettiere will have a hard time making a case for herself alone.

13. archie panjabi (the good wife): PRO: She shockingly won the Emmy her first year, and received two nominations afterwards. People like Kalinda. They like how mysterious and badass she is. Panjabi also gives a great performance. Against all odds, she still received a Golden Globe nomination last year. CON: This wasn’t the best season for Kalinda in terms of story arc. The first half was pretty much a giant misfire in terms of her development. They (the writers) made things right by abruptly getting rid of her husband. But, with nothing to fall back on, Kalinda was pretty much given nothing to do for the second half. Panjabi tries her hardest, but this was not the best year for her character.

14. jessica pare (mad men): PRO: After failing to get a nomination last year for Lead Actress, she’s trying her luck in the supporting category. This may be a smart idea considering she was never going to get a nomination over Elizabeth Moss, and that it seems like in the Supporting Actress category, voters are more willing to nominate two actresses from the same show (this has been the case since 2006). CON: Pare does a really good job on the show, but out of all the regular female characters on the show (and this includes Sally and Betty), Megan is the least interesting to me. Maybe if she was dying by the end of the season, she would have a better chance.

15. monica potter (parenthood): PRO: This isn’t a show I’m caught up on yet (I’m still on season 1), but I’m so far impressed with Potter’s performance in the first few episodes. However, it is this current season that Potter seems to be getting a boat load of praise and buzz for her cancer story line. If the voters pick up on this buzz and maybe watch a few episodes from this season before making their final decision, I could see a surprise  nomination  for Potter. CON: Despite some heavy praise, Parenthood suffers when it comes to both awards and ratings. I have a feeling, despite all the praise, Potter will miss out. Remember when Zach Gilford got a lot of buzz for the fourth season of Friday Night Lights but was still snubbed? I feel like this may be the same situation for Potter. Parenthood just isn’t popular enough with voters…at least right now.

16. maggie smith (downton abbey): PRO: Let’s make this quick. With two previous wins for this role, everyone’s favorite witty grandma will be back again this year. She even had some nice (IMO, overrated) dramatic work in the episode where Sybill dies (spoiler alert!) CON: Fatigue? Outrage over her last win? Maybe?

Other strong contenders: Lena Headey (Game of Thrones), January Jones (Mad Men), Kelly Macdonald (Boardwalk Empire), Emily Mortimer (The Newsroom), Sandra Oh (Grey’s Anatomy), Morgan Saylor (Homeland), Kiernan Shipka (Mad Men), Chandra Wilson (Grey’s Anatomy)

Long shots worth considering: Betsy Brandt (Breaking Bad), Jennifer Carpenter (Dexter), Mary McDonnell (The Closer), Madeleine Stowe (Revenge)

Even longer shots I recommend checking out: Clare Bowen (Nashville), Megan Hilty and Debra Messing (Smash), Emma Kenney (Shameless), Katie Lowes and Bellamy Young (Scandal), Alison Pill (The Newsroom), Sara Ramirez (Grey’s Anatomy)

Read the ballots here to see who else was submitted in this category. Thanks for reading! More coming soon! For more Emmy stuff, click here.

2013
06/19
CATEGORY
awards
breaking bad
drama
emmy awards
emmys
friday night lights
nominations
predictions
reflection
review
series finale
television
the good wife
tv
TAGS









2 comments

2013 Emmy Predictions (Top Contenders) – Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series


anna chlumsky veep

Interestingly enough, there was a time when, before the actual nominations came out, voters would narrow down all the contenders to the “top 10″. They obviously don’t do that anymore. But…we can still assume which contenders are at the top of the voter’s minds. Before I release my official nomination predictions around early July, I am going to run down which 10 or so contenders are the biggest threats…and maybe some personal long shots that I believe voters should consider. Here we go!

(Yeah…I copied that opening paragraph from last season…deal with it.)

For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Here are the top Emmy contenders for Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series. In alphabetical order…

1. mayim bialik (the big bang theory): PRO: Last year, she earned her first nomination in what was a minor shock. This year, with two slots “open” in this category, she could definitely find herself back. For one reason or another, I didn’t watch the show this season, but I do believe, based on the last season, she definitely elevated the show and made it funnier. In short – if voters still love the show, they’ll still love her. CON: But if the voters decide they no longer support the show, then I think she’d be hanging on by a thread.

2. julie bowen (modern family): PRO: She won in this category the last two years. There’s no way she’s going to suddenly be dropped after winning the two previous years. CON: But then there was Jeremy Piven who was completely dropped after three wins in a row. As Mary Poppins sings, “Anything can happen…”

3. anna chlumsky (veep): PRO: As the level headed VP’s chief of staff, Chlumsky plays the role with such control and adept comic timing. With more and more people appreciating the show, I could see voters looking beyond Julia-Louis Dreyfuss and giving one of her co-stars a supporting nomination. In that case, I think Chlumsky has the strongest chance in this relatively wide open category. CON: Worst case scenario – the voters won’t be able to look past JLD.

4. kaley cuoco (the big bang theory): PRO: Despite the additions of Bialik and Melissa Rauch, Cuoco still sort of remains the “female face” of the show. Although Jim Parsons has become the show’s MVP, I think some of the show’s growing success should also be credited towards Cuoco, who plays her “dumb blonde” character with such enthusiasm and earnestness. CON: However, in the show’s six seasons, she’s never gotten a nomination. It’s admittedly silly that I still consider her a “top contender” when other people who have actually gotten nominations aren’t anymore…

5. sarah hyland (modern family): PRO: Like I did with “Supporting Actor,” I’ve decided to include the kids here because I think the show’s popular enough for even them to be serious contenders. However, this was honestly started because at this year’s Critics’ Choice Awards (which should really be called “The Underrated Awards”), Hyland was the only part of Modern Family that received a nomination. So…I dunno, are people beginning to look past age and notice her as a worthy nominee? CON: Critics don’t vote for the Emmys.

6. jane krakowski (30 rock): PRO: The biggest disappointment from last year were the voters snubbing Jane K. After three nominations in a row, Krakowski was passed over despite being the funniest thing about season 6 of 30 Rock. However, with this being 30 Rock‘s last season (and with Jenna getting one of the final moments of the series, singing a hilarious rendition of “Rural Juror”), I could see Krakowski overcoming the “once you’re out, you’re out” rule and getting one last chance to submit an episode. CON: After her snub last year (and never winning before then), I’m not sure if the voters have much regard for Krakowski. I could see this going either way.

7. kate mckinnon (saturday night live): PRO: Kristen Wiig was nominated the last four years in this category. With her out of the way this year, there is an open spot…and that spot could easily go to another SNL player. While Nasim and Vanessa are main cast members,  those two didn’t have the impact that would get them noticed. That’s where featured player Kate McKinnon would come in. Dubbed as the “next Kristen Wiig” because her wide array of impression and eccentricities, I believe she has the best chance at continuing the “Supporting Actress SNL” legacy that Amy Poehler started. CON: But, at the same time, she’s only a featured player. And in terms of screen time, she hasn’t stood out the same way Wiig did. This will be tough for her.

8. cecily strong (saturday night live): PRO: If there’s been a surprise this SNL season, it has been Strong’s coming of age. Very quickly, she fit right in the cast; and by the end of the season, she was the “go to female” for many of the sketches. Her breakout sketches were definitely “Girl You Wish…” spots she had during Weekend Update. She has proven herself to be a versatile cast member and has a lot of people (including me) rooting for her. CON: Let’s face it, even if the voters consider giving a spot to one of the SNL ladies…it’ll only be one of them. So…which one? Which one?

9. sofia vergara (modern family): PRO: Although she hasn’t won an Emmy, she must be pretty pleased with her three nominations + a bundle of nominations from other notable award shows, including The Golden Globes. She’s also the face of every product in America, appearing in over 100 commercials a year (OK, I made that statistic up, but, still, she is EVERYWHERE.) People love her. She’s in. CON: I think…Julie Bowen has a better chance at a nomination than her. That doesn’t matter because…most voters will naturally find space for both of them.

10. jessica walter (arrested development): PRO: While reviews for the show have been mixed, many have been impressed with how quickly Walter slipped into the role of Lucille Bluth after a 7 year break. She won an Emmy in 1975 and was nominated three times afterwards, with her latest nomination being for the second season of Arrested Development. I could definitely see her getting in, even if the show doesn’t receive widespread awards support. CON: However, she wasn’t nominated for the 1st and 3rd seasons of AD, so her record is spotty at best. Maybe she’ll get a nod for her voice work on Archer instead. Shrug!

11. merritt wever (nurse jackie): PRO: After two years of being snubbed, Wever received her first nomination last year; this shows that she’s always been an “under the radar” contender and that I grossly misjudged her chances (she was a “long shot” last year when I was doing this) . Not anymore! I don’t know if she’ll receive another nomination, but clearly she has fans with the Academy and clearly she will get a substantial amount of voters. CON: I’ve heard rumblings that this season didn’t live up to the overall excellent fourth one. If that’s true then…[holds onto collar in a nervous manner.]

12. betty white (hot in cleveland): PRO: The Awards favorite has a bundle of nominations and 5 wins. She received a nomination for this show a couple years ago. And then last year she received a nomination for “Outstanding Host,” presumably getting a nomination over “four times in a row” winner Jeff Probst. It seems like she always has to be nominated for something every year so…maybe it’ll be this show again. She’s also won two SAGs and was nominated for a third one which shows widespread support among the actors in the Academy. CON: She wasn’t nominated for Hot in Cleveland last year. Maybe the “raunchy grandma” routine is getting old to some people?

13. allison williams (girls): PRO: If Girls is going to receive acting nominations outside Lena Dunham, then I think Adam Driver and Allison Williams have the strongest chance. Williams’s character felt more fleshed out this second time around, mostly because her story lines were away from Hannah’s (Lena Dunham). Also her performance of “Stronger” may have impressed voters. CON: Similar to Driver’s “CON,” Allison Williams doesn’t have a very funny character. Actually, she may be the most serious character on the show.

14. ariel winter (modern family): PRO: Winter is growing up – it’s as simple as that. Also between her personal issues (which I won’t go into) and her new animated show on Disney, she’s getting a lot of exposure outside Modern Family. That will only help her out. CON: The Emmys just don’t nominate kids. It was worth a try though.

Other strong contenders: Ellen Barkin (The New Normal), Diane Ladd (Enlightened), Cloris Leachman (Raising Hope), Jane Lynch (Glee), Wendie Malick (Hot in Cleveland), Melissa Rauch (The Big Bang Theory), Alia Shawkat (Arrested Development), Hannah Simone (New Girl)

Long shots worth considering: Kristen Bell (House of Lies), Valerie Bertinelli (Hot in Cleveland), Conchata Ferrell (Two and a Half Men), Jenna Fischer (The Office), Ellie Kemper (The Office), Jemima Kirke (Girls), Jane Leeves (Hot in Cleveland), Zosia Mamet (Girls)

Even longer shots I recommend checking out: Sufe Bradshaw (Veep), Yvette Nicole Brown (Community), Carrie Brownstein (Portlandia), Tamsin Greig (Episodes), Angela Kinsey and Phyllis Smith (The Office), Retta (Parks and Recreation), Maya Rudolph (Up All Night), Amy Schumer (Amy Schumer), Eden Sher (The Middle), Casey Wilson (Happy Endings), Bebe Wood (The New Normal)

Read the ballots here to see who else was submitted in this category. Thanks for reading! More coming soon! For more Emmy stuff, click here.

2013
06/18
CATEGORY
30 rock
awards
emmy awards
emmys
glee
nominations
predictions
reflection
review
saturday night live
SNL
snubbed
television
tv
TAGS









2 comments

2013 Emmy Predictions (Top Contenders) – Supporting Actor in a Drama Series


corey stoll house of cards

Interestingly enough, there was a time when, before the actual nominations came out, voters would narrow down all the contenders to the “top 10″. They obviously don’t do that anymore. But…we can still assume which contenders are at the top of the voter’s minds. Before I release my official nomination predictions around early July, I am going to run down which 10 or so contenders are the biggest threats…and maybe some personal long shots that I believe voters should consider. Here we go!

(Yeah…I copied that opening paragraph from last season…deal with it.)

For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Here are the top Emmy contenders for Supporting Actor in a Drama Series. In alphabetical order…

This category was particularly difficult for me (it usually is) so…hopefully, whoever gets nominated in this category is at least mentioned in this post, whether they’re a “top contender” or not…

1. jonathan banks (breaking bad): PRO: Banks had a really great season this year. With Giancarlo Esposito out of the way, Banks was really been allowed to stand out as the “real badass in charge.” I don’t want to give any spoilers away but…let’s just say…something happens to his character by the end of the season that would make voters more inclined to pick him this year. CON: This would be his first nomination for the show so…it’s tricky. Otherwise, all signs should point towards a nomination.

2. jim carter (downton abbey): PRO: People don’t want to admit it, but he was nominated last year so, technically, he is a top contender. This season, Carter did more of the same…but it’s that “same” that the voters liked the last season. I could see him repeating. CON: Was Carter really nominated last year because voters genuinely admired his performance…or because they just wanted to give Downton Abbey as many nominations as possible? I believe Carter’s nomination mostly depends on how voters regarded the show this season.

3. alan cumming (the good wife): PRO: He’s been nominated twice (once for guest) for this role, but he was snubbed last year. People still really like how quirky this character is. He brings a sense of humor to the show and definitely stands out among the cast. Out of all the supporting actors on the show, he has the best chance of squeezing in. Also, if the New York voters watched his performance of Macbeth on Broadway and was upset that he was snubbed at the Tonys, giving him an Emmy nomination might make up for it. CON: I’m trying to think off the top of my head what “episode” he would submit if he got a nomination. I honestly can’t. Maybe that’s just my bad memory but…I don’t know if he stood out this season IMO.

4. peter dinklage (game of thrones): PRO: He won for his first season and received another nomination last year. The Emmy voters don’t seem to appreciate the cast much, but Dinklage is the one actor that stands out among them. CON: I’m the only person in the world that doesn’t watch this show regularly. I’m also the only person in the world who (from the little I’ve seen) isn’t crazy about his performance.

5. noah emmerich (the americans): PRO: I don’t know anything about this show or his role on the show, but I do know that Emmerich (of Truman Show fame) is a long working, respected actor who’s never been nominated before. If this show becomes the Emmy hit it is destined to be, I could see this as Emmerich’s chance at getting in. People are already predicting him for a nomination. CON: However, if The Americans doesn’t get the broad Emmy support, I’d be little surprised to see Emmerich’s name on the list of 6.

6. larry hagman (dallas): PRO: Despite its relatively good reviews, I don’t think Dallas was destined to be much of an Emmy favorite. However, voters may want to honor Hagman for his contribution to television and give him a posthumous nomination “John Ritter-style.” It’s not too far-fetched. He was nominated for the role in the 80′s a couple times, and he has gotten some good notices for his performance in the revival. I could definitely see a spot saved for him. CON: I hate asking this but…would Larry Hagman be such a strong contender if he were still alive? I don’t watch the show so I don’t truly know. However, I wasn’t hearing people say “Larry Hagman deserves an Emmy” before his death. Just a thought…

7. rob james-collier (downton abbey): PRO: Who else watched “Episode 7″ and went OH SHIT!? Yeah, exactly. This season, we saw a different side of Thomas. A more vulnerable side of him that voters, who we know watch the show, may appreciate. With Brendan Coyle curiously not being submitted, James-Collier could rightfully take the now empty Downton Abbey spot for this category. CON: James-Collier has always given a good performance, so why hasn’t he been nominated before? Even last season, him being nominated would have probably made more sense than Jim Carter. It’ll be interesting if voters have just noticed Rob James-Collier.

8. vincent kartheiser (mad men): PRO: At this point, it may seem silly to anticipate a Vincent Kartheiser nomination. However, John Slattery’s snub last year in favor of the new Jared Harris may give us some newfound hope. Maybe voters have just realized that there could possibly be more deserving actors than John Slattery…including Kartheiser. CON: Or…maybe Harris only got nominated last year because his character committed suicide, and now that he’s not eligible, Slattery will take his spot on the short list again. Maybe they’ll continue to snub Kartheiser the same way they’ve been snubbing him the last 5 years.

9. mandy patinkin (homeland): PRO: Last year, Patinkin didn’t get a nomination. The writers of Homeland took note and gave Patinkin stronger, more emotional material. In some cases, he would be the best thing about an episode. Last year, I didn’t particularly think he deserved a nomination. This year? I think he would be in my personal top 6. Do the voters feel the same way? Despite the criticisms this season has accumulated, Homeland is still expected to have a strong showing, possibly even stronger than last year. CON: But still…he wasn’t nominated last year. So this year will be especially nail-biting.

10. aaron paul (breaking bad): PRO: He has been nominated three times, winning for his last two eligible years. Even last year when most people were predicting Esposito (not me!), he still prevailed. He continues to be intense and sublime in his role and there is NO reason why he should be left off this year. CON: Absolutely no reason.

11. john slattery (mad men): PRO: He was consistently nominated for the show’s first four years before being dropped last season in favor of Jared Harris. However, now that Harris is gone, I could Slattery comfortably taking his spot again. Similar to Cumming, Slattery is nice comedic relief for the show and usually breaks the tension. Also, that signature grey hair? Sa-exy. CON: Even though Mad Men is a very popular show among voters, the “once you’re out, you’re out” rule may still apply to John Slattery. Also, so far (the show still has only one episode left to air), Slattery hasn’t been given too much to do.

12. corey stoll (house of cards): PRO: Since Midnight in Paris, Stoll has broken out and become a truly a respected actor. His performance in House of Cards has gotten praise and even earned him a Critics Choice Award nomination. If a complete newcomer can squeeze into the race, it’s probably Stoll. CON: Despite the praise, sometimes it takes a year or two before an actor is nominated. Just ask Aaron Paul…or even Michael C. Hall. Sometimes a voter simply needs more proof of worthiness before adding him to his or her ballot.

13. Sam Waterston (the newsroom): PRO: He’s been nominated for eight Emmys, but he’s never won for an acting performance. Nonetheless, he’s clearly an Emmy favorite and, I believe, being on the long running (and maybe tiring) Law & Order has kept him from receiving more Emmy nods. With this new, fresh role as network president Charlie Skinner, maybe he finally has a chance for Emmy glory. CON: No Golden Globe nomination might be a crutch (although, it’s much harder for a supporting performer to get nominated for a Golden Globe than an Emmy). Still, this show is very divided and Waterston will need all the people who love the show to vote for him in order to get the nomination.

Other strong contenders: Bobby Cannavale (Boardwalk Empire), Josh Charles (The Good Wife), Guillermo Diaz (Scandal), Ben Feldman (Mad Men), Walton Goggins (Justified), David Harewood (Homeland), Kit Harington (Game of Thrones), Freddie Highmore (Bates Motel), Mads Mikkelsen (Hannibal), John Noble (Fringe), Dean Norris (Breaking Bad), Kevin Rahm (Mad Men)

Long shots worth considering: Michael Cuditz (Southland), Matt Czurchy (The Good Wife), Tony Goldwyn (Scandal), Jeff Perry (Scandal), Michael Shannon (Boardwalk Empire)

Even longer shots I recommend checking out: Noel Fisher, Cameron Monaghan, and Jeremy Allen White (Shameless), Jordan Garavis (Orphan Black), James Pickens Jr. (Grey’s Anatomy)

Read the ballots here to see who else was submitted in this category. Thanks for reading! More coming soon! For more Emmy stuff, click here.

2013
06/17
CATEGORY
awards
breaking bad
drama
emmy awards
emmys
nominations
predictions
reflection
review
snubbed
television
the good wife
tv
TAGS









2 comments

2013 Emmy Predictions (Top Contenders) – Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series


girls adam driver

Interestingly enough, there was a time when, before the actual nominations came out, voters would narrow down all the contenders to the “top 10″. They obviously don’t do that anymore. But…we can still assume which contenders are at the top of the voter’s minds. Before I release my official nomination predictions around early July, I am going to run down which 10 or so contenders are the biggest threats…and maybe some personal long shots that I believe voters should consider. Here we go!

(Yeah…I copied that opening paragraph from last season…deal with it.)

For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Here are the top Emmy contenders for Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series. In alphabetical order…

1. will arnett (arrested development): PRO: He’s been nominated for five Emmys, four of those being for his guest role on 30 Rock, and one for Arrested Development‘s “last” season. Voters clearly know who he is and enjoy his work. CON: There are a couple cons, though. One, he’s been a regular on THREE series since Arrested Development ended, but he’s only gotten Emmy recognition for 30 Rock. So…he probably has a better chance getting one last guest nomination for 30 Rock, than a nomination for this more crowded “Modern Family-loving” category. And, second…the divorce from Amy Poehler. Just sayin’…some friends of Amy Poehler may not want to vote for him. Ridiculous, but possible.

2. ty burrell (modern family): PRO: He’s been nominated the last three years, winning for his second. He’s also been nominated for the  SAGs and Golden Globes among other things. I think he and Eric Stonestreet have the best chance at staying another year among the males on the show. CON: …and I think Eric Stonestreet has a better chance than Ty Burrell when it comes to being nominated again. So there’s that!

3. adam driver (girls): PRO: Adam Driver is arguably the best actor (male or female) on Girls. I mean, he went to Juilliard! I think Driver has done some really deep and interesting things with a character that could have been expendable. And with Girls itself getting a lot of Emmy buzz, Driver could benefit from the show’s predicted domination. CON: He hasn’t been nominated for anything so far, although it’s still pretty early for him. Also…his character isn’t really “funny.” For voters who like their comedy contenders to make them laugh (and not be “rapey”), Driver wouldn’t be their ideal candidate.

4. jesse tyler ferguson (modern family): PRO: He was nominated for the last three seasons. While I didn’t much care for him or his character in the beginning of the first season, I think Ferguson has come to his own and is making a bigger impression with every episode. Also, he’s just a friendly personality and seems to be really popular. Take his recent appearance at this year’s Tonys. CON: Besides a recent People Choice Award nomination, he’s never really been nominated for anything outside the Emmys. I’ve made this claim the last three years and he still keeps getting nominated so…screw it! He’s in.

5. nolan gould (modern family): PRO: I think the kids are becoming old enough to be serious Emmy contenders. I mean, honestly, I think 4 of the 6 slots will be filled by the Modern Family men so there’s no point highlighting too many actors outside the show. Uh…where was I going with this? Yeah, Gould is a contender. Congratulations! CON: The Emmys don’t like kids. Unless your character has been molested by Ted Danson or you’re Anne Frank, it’s hard for someone under the age of 21 to get a nomination.

6. max greenfield (new girl): PRO: Earned his first nomination last year. New Girl continues to be a hit with audiences and critics. And even though Jake Johnson has gotten a lot of praise, people still seem to love Schmidt (also, who cares? Jake Johnson is competing in lead which moreso helps Greenfield). Also, Greenfield in a fat suit = Emmy gold. CON: I didn’t watch every episode of New Girl this season, but it doesn’t seem like Greenfield’s character did as much as he did during the first season. He could be passed over for a newer contender.

7. bill hader (saturday night live): PRO: Earned a semi-surprising Emmy nomination last season after 6 years of being snubbed. Between the legendary “Puppet sketch” and the fact that it’s his last season, he has a great chance of repeating for one last chance at Emmy gold. CON: Again, his nomination last year sort of came out of nowhere. This is the year where we’ll find out whether his nomination was a fluke or not. (I hope not because think he was deserving last season and he would be deserving this year.)

8. taran killam (saturday night live): PRO: With this being his first year as a full cast member, he has broken out as one of the show’s most reliable cast members, with a slew of impressive impressions…or what I like to call: impressions. (Puns!) Anyway, voters seem to like SNL cast members (Poehler, Wiig, Hader). I could see Killam, as the show’s new alpha-male, joining that list. CON: Once Hader, Armisen, and maybe even Sudeikis, leave the show next season, I could see Killam standing out even more, thus having a better chance at getting a nomination.

9. ed o’neill (modern family): PRO: Although he was shockingly snubbed during the show’s first year, he’s been redeemed with receiving two nominations afterwards. How many more ways are there to say “The Emmys love Modern Family”? CON: His character isn’t as flamboyant or “out there” as the others. His character is very grounded (from what I’ve noticed). Older voters may appreciate him…but will the younger ones be entertained?

10. rico reodriguez (modern family): PRO: Because at this point, he has a better f@#kin’ chance at getting in than Nick Offerman. CON: The “kid thing” I mentioned earlier. Also…I just think after the first season, the novelty his character had became less interesting. JMO. He probably deserved a nomination for the show’s first season. After that? Eh…

11. eric stonestreet (modern family): PRO: He’s been nominated the last three years. He won for the show’s first season and, again (against most predictions) for the third season. Also, his cameo in Identity Thief may give him more visibility. He’s a crazy, fun character and, for better or worse, he’s memorable. CON: The character’s lack of nuance or subtlety may - who am I kidding? It’s comedy! People love his shtick!

12. jeffrey tambor (arrested development): PRO: He’s been nominated for six Emmys, including two for Arrested Development. AD has gotten so much buzz that one of the supporting actors are bound to get in. Just…which one? CON: Based on pure name recognition, Tambor could get in. However…let’s be honest, his two episodes this season were probably the weakest. I believe there are more deserving supporting actors from the show (like Will Arnett). Maybe I’m not alone in this.

Other strong contenders: Fred Armisen (SNL or Portlandia), Michael Cera (Arrested Development), Chris Colfer (Glee), David Cross (Arrested Development), Tony Hale (Veep), Neil Patrick Harris (How I Met Your Mother), Simon Helberg (The Big Bang Theory), Lamorne Morris (New Girl), Nick Offerman (Parks and Recreation), Jason Sudeikis (SNL)

Long shots worth considering: Ed Helms (The Office), Alex Karpovsky (Girls), Jack McBrayer (30 Rock), Chris Messina (The Mindy Project), Tracy Jordan (30 Rock), Kunal Nayyar (The Big Bang Theory), Mike White (Enlightened), Rainn Wilson (The Office)

Even longer shots I recommend checking out: Doesn’t Scott Adsit (30 Rock) finally deserve some recognition? Also: Keegan Michael Key and Jordan Peele (Key and Peele), Stephen Mangan (Episodes), Garrett Morris (2 Broke Girls), Reid Scott, Timothy Simons, and Matt Walsh (Veep), Kenan Thompson (SNL), James Van Der Beek (Don’t Trust the B…)

Read the ballots here to see who else was submitted in this category. Thanks for reading! More coming soon! For more Emmy stuff, click here.

2013
06/16
CATEGORY
30 rock
tv
television
awards
predictions
glee
review
snubbed
nominations
emmy awards
emmys
reflection
TAGS









3 comments

2013 Emmy Predictions (Top Contenders) – Lead Actress in a Drama Series


tatiana maslany orphan black

Interestingly enough, there was a time when, before the actual nominations came out, voters would narrow down all the contenders to the “top 10″. They obviously don’t do that anymore. But…we can still assume which contenders are at the top of the voter’s minds. Before I release my official nomination predictions around early July, I am going to run down which 10 or so contenders are the biggest threats…and maybe some personal long shots that I believe voters should consider. Here we go!

(Yeah…I copied that opening paragraph from last season…deal with it.)

For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Here are the top Emmy contenders for Lead Actress in a Drama Series. In alphabetical order…

1. connie britton (nashville): PRO: She was nominated last year in the Movie/Miniseries category for American Horror Story, and then two times in a row in this category for Friday Night Lights. She’s obviously become an Emmy favorite. Nashville was one of the most buzzed new network drama series of the season and she’s right in the center of that buzz. CON: Yes, she was nominated for a Golden Globe this year but…I dunno…can she really get an Emmy nomination? Nashville is a fun show, but I’m not sure if the show (and her performance) are top 6 material. Although…I honestly haven’t watched the show since January so maybe things have changed.

2. glenn close (damages): PRO: She’s been nominated for this role every year she’s been eligible, and she won 2 Emmys for the first 2 seasons. Even if voters have become disinterested in the show itself, they still seem very fond of Close. This is the show’s last year. Voters may want to honor her. Also…she’s Glenn Close. CON: The series finale aired so long ago…I remember it being a great finale, but did the voters remember?

3. claire danes (homeland): PRO: C’mon. Danes has created one of the most complex, intense female characters for television. Carrie Mathison has practically become an icon. On a technical front…she has an Emmy, 2 Golden Globes, and a SAG for this season (obviously, this is specifically for Homeland.) There’s no way she’s missing out this year. CON: Homeland has gotten some “The Killing”-sized criticism this year…but I doubt that should affect Danes much. She’s in. She’s totally in.

4. michelle dockery (downton abbey): PRO: While Maggie Smith is the only actor on the show to actually win awards, Dockery has also set herself from the cast with all her nominations – an Emmy nomination last year, a Golden Globe nod, and a “hard to get” SAG nomination. She was given a lot to work with this season and if voters liked her performance last year, then they probably like what she did this year. CON: However, this year, the Lead Actress category is even more competitive with a lot of new worthy contenders. I haven’t made an official prediction, but I don’t think she’s as much of a lock as Claire Danes or even Julianna Margulies. We’ll see. (I know, this goes against what I wrote earlier.)

5. vera farmiga (bates motel): PRO: Before Bates Motel, Vera Farmiga was mostly a movie actress (with an Oscar nomination under her belt). But the Television Academy loves movie stars doing TV. I’m not trying to compare Farmiga to Glenn Close…buuut…actually, I won’t go there. But Bates Motel has gotten a strong critical reception and some people are actually predicting Farmiga so I’ll put her as a top contender. She was also nominated for a TCA Award. CON: It’s a new, “spring semester” show in an already crowded year…and, despite her Oscar nomination, Farmiga isn’t necessarily a household name. She certainly won’t get nomination through blind name recognition.

6. julianna margulies (the good wife): PRO: Along with her one Emmy and two nominations for this role, she has pretty much been nominated (and won) for every other major award out there. Her performance in this season was no different than the three before it (in fact, it was probably better). She has a real, wonderful leading role on a wonderful TV series. CON: Last year, the show wasn’t nominated for Drama Series. Uh oh! Do voters not like this show anymore???

7. tatiana maslany (orphan black): PRO: She could certainly be the surprise hit of the Emmys. If voters took the time to actually watch this show, they’d realize how EXCELLENT she is. Seriously, I’m only on the 4th episode and she’s already played like 10 roles. She’s a chameleon and has a harder task than any of the the other contenders here. She not only deserves a nomination…but I believe she deserves win. (I may be biased, I’ve been a fan of her since her days on renegadepress.com.) CON: Yeah, she’s been getting notice from the various critics awards…but they’ve never been great Emmy predictors. She’s an unfamous Canadian actress on a show very few people realize exist. This is going to take prayer.

8. elizabeth moss (mad men): PRO: She’s been nominated four times for this role and will probably get another nomination this year.. Moss definitely does some very interesting things with this character. She’s my favorite thing about the show right now. CON: …although, I can’t say she would be in my personal top 6. Let’s wait and see…

9. keri russell (the americans): PRO: Interestingly enough, she was never nominated for Felicity (despite a Golden Globe win). However, this new, darker, maturer, critically acclaimed role might do the trick. Both she and the show are receiving a lot of buzz. CON: There’s not really much of a “con” to be honest. Only time will tell how the Emmys respond to the show. Ya neva know!

10. kyra sedgwick (the closer): PRO: Before finally winning the Emmy in 2010, she was nominated four times. However, after 2010, she was strangely dropped from the lineup and hasn’t recovered since then. Still, this is her last season, and voters may want to put her back in the race one last time (for this role, at least.) CON: The old Emmy rule: “Once you’re out, you’re out!” Another Emmy rule: “The Emmys aren’t as sentimental as we think they are.” I think Kristen Wiig and the late great Kathryn Joosten can attest to that.

11. kerry washington (scandal): PRO: Seriously, Scandal is not only a great show, but Kerry Washington absolutely nails it. She does so well with portraying “pain and regret,” all the while being a buttkicking badass in the process. She hasn’t been nominated for anything major yet…but the Emmys could fix that mistake. CON: Network dramas and Emmys never seem to be a good mix. Mark my words – if this show were on Showtime or HBO or AMC, Washington would be a much more confident contender here.

12. robin wright (house of cards): PRO: Emmy voters love women in power. Like Tina Fey mentioned in 2010: “These women are terrifying.” Wright plays her character with a confident and subtle power. Emmy voters like that kind of stuff. I wouldn’t be surprised if she got a nomination. CON: …I also wouldn’t surprised if she didn’t get in. When it comes to House of Cards, people are talking about Kevin Spacey and Corey Stoll…I just don’t think the women on the show are getting much recognition.

Other strong contenders: Mariska Hargitay (Law and Order: SVU), Mary McDonnell (Major Crimes), Emmy Rossum (Shameless)

Long shots worth considering: Taraji P. Henson (Person of Interest), Lucy Liu (Elementary), Anna Paquin (True Blood), Ellen Pompeo (Grey’s Anatomy), Katey Sagal (Sons of Anarchy)

Even longer shot I recommend checking out: Jennifer Love Hewitt (The Client List)

Read the ballots here to see who else was submitted in this category. Thanks for reading! More coming soon! For more Emmy stuff, click here.

2013
06/15
CATEGORY
tv
the good wife
grey's anatomy
television
awards
predictions
review
nominations
emmy awards
emmys
series finale
reflection
connie britton
drama
TAGS









3 comments

2013 Emmy Predictions (Top Contenders) – Lead Actress in a Comedy Series


tina fey 30 rock

Interestingly enough, there was a time when, before the actual nominations came out, voters would narrow down all the contenders to the “top 10″. They obviously don’t do that anymore. But…we can still assume which contenders are at the top of the voter’s minds. Before I release my official nomination predictions around early July, I am going to run down which 10 or so contenders are the biggest threats…and maybe some personal long shots that I believe voters should consider. Here we go!

(Yeah…I copied that opening paragraph from last season…deal with it.)

For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Here are the top Emmy contenders for Lead Actress in a Comedy Series. In alphabetical order…

1. portia de rossi (arrested development): PRO: She is the only person on this show who submitted in this category. So, if the voters decide to really embrace Arrested Development, then she might actually get swept up in the buzz. Yes, she’s never been nominated before…but she’s also never been given an entire episode to herself. CON: Still…she’s never been nominated before.

2. laura dern (enlightened): PRO: Despite its low ratings, Enlightened has become one of the most critically acclaimed shows of the year, topping many critics’ top 10 lists. Although she (shockingly) didn’t receive a nod last year, she is still a reliable Emmy favorite, having been nominated for 4 Emmys in the past for previous works. CON: Along with not being nominated last year when she was considered a front runner, the show was cancelled, which is never a good ingredient for Emmy consideration. I feel like fans of the show will fight for it…but it still may not be enough to convince stubborn Emmy voters.

3. zooey deschanel (the new girl): PRO: She received a nomination last year despite the mixed reviews. This season, fans of the show have definitely warmed up to Deschanel’s character. And I think the producers have reined her quirkiness more. She may have broader support this season. CON: …or maybe her nomination last year was a “one time thing” like Martha Plimpton…

4. lena dunham (girls): PRO: Both her and the show received a lot of Emmy nominations last year…but no wins. However, the show recovered when it dominated at the Golden Globes among other other awards. For better or worse, Girls gets a lot of buzz and reception and her name will be hard to ignore on the ballots. CON: I appreciated how bold this season was (even if I found the first season funnier)…but other people seem to think less of it. People either love the show or hate it. Also, not getting a SAG nomination could be a roadblock.

5. edie falco (nurse jackie): PRO: Edie Falco is an Emmy queen. She won 3 Emmys for The Sopranos. She won an additional Emmy for Nurse Jackie, and has been nominated every year since then. The nomination  for her and her co-star Merrit Weaver last year shows a continuing support for the show. CON: Similar to Girls and especially Enlightened, the show can be very dramatic with a very dry and dark sense of humor. With more comedic shows and performances still getting the wins, it’s harder for these types of dramedies to make an impression with voters, especially the older ones. Just an observation…

6. tina fey (30 rock): PRO: Tina Fey NEEDS one more nomination. She is one of the best television comedy actresses right now and it would be embarrassing if she were left off the top 6/7. There I said it! On top of that, she’s been nominated in this category for the last 6 years, winning for her second. She’ll get in. CON: She may get a nomination in the writing category instead…

7. mindy kaling (the mindy project): PRO: A funny leading debut for Mindy. She’s only gotten nominations for writing The Office, but voters like creator/star-types (like Tina Fey). Really, she’s the show’s best chance at a nomination. She could get her first nomination the same way fellow FOX star Zooey Deschanel got in. CON: The show’s been on since the fall, yet she hasn’t really gotten much. And reviews for the show seem more ambivalent than anything. Let’s just say, the network will have to do a LOT of campaigning.

8. julia louis-drefus (veep): PRO: She’s safe, c’mon! She’s won three Emmys (for three different shows) and bunch of other nominations for the seasons in between. Veep has been on fire this season and there’s really no reason why she could suddenly be left off. CON: No SAG nomination is the only thing I can think of.

9. melissa mccarthy (mike and molly): PRO: She won for her first season. She was nominated again last year. And during these last few months, she has become a big movie star, with Identity Thief becoming a huge success (commercially, not critically) and she has another movie with Sandra Bullock on the way. People love Melissa McCarthy and people will vote for her…even without checking out the show first. CON: It’s just interesting that the Emmys is the only major award show that acknowledges both her and the show. It’s a “Breaking Bad” sort of situation. What’s up with that???

10. martha plimpton (raising hope): PRO: She was nominated a couple years ago. While she didn’t receive a nomination last year, she still won an Emmy for a guest role on The Good Wife which shows some widespread support for the actress. She’s guaranteed another Guest Actress in a Drama Series nomination. But will that carry her back into Comedy consideration? CON: Probably not. We just have to admit to ourselves that Raising Hope is not an “Emmy show.” No shame in that. Good Times was never nominated for an Emmy and that show was/is dynomite!

11. amy poehler (parks and recreation): PRO: She’s been nominated the last three years. And she was arguably a front runner for the last 2, despite getting snubbed. The show may be off the radar, but I think Poehler will continue getting nominations, if only to see what funny thing she’ll plan for the ceremony. CON: It’s sad Poehler’s never won. Apparently, this season, she doesn’t have the same showcase she had with last year’s “Win, Lose, or Draw.” But that shouldn’t stop her. I think she’s safe.

Other strong contenders: Sutton Foster (Bunheads), Lea Michele (Glee), Mary Louise-Parker (Weeds)

Long shot worth considering: Patricia Heaton (The Middle)

Even longer shots I recommend checking out: Beth Behrs, Kat Dennings (2 Broke Girls), and Courtney Cox (Cougar Town). Also, I’d legitimately put Krysten Ritter (Don’t Trust the B) in my top 6. She’s hilarious and underrated on that show.

Read the ballots here to see who else was submitted in this category. Thanks for reading! More coming soon! For more Emmy stuff, click here.

2013
06/13
CATEGORY
30 rock
awards
emmy awards
emmys
fox
glee
nominations
predictions
reflection
review
snubbed
television
tv
TAGS









2 comments

2013 Emmy Predictions (Top Contenders) – Lead Actor in a Drama Series


house of cards kevin spacey

Interestingly enough, there was a time when, before the actual nominations came out, voters would narrow down all the contenders to the “top 10″. They obviously don’t do that anymore. But…we can still assume which contenders are at the top of the voter’s minds. Before I release my official nomination predictions around early July, I am going to run down which 10 or so contenders are the biggest threats…and maybe some personal long shots that I believe voters should consider. Here we go!

(Yeah…I copied that opening paragraph from last season…deal with it.)

For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Here are the top Emmy contenders for Lead Actor in a Drama Series. In alphabetical order…

1. hugh bonneville (downton abbey): PRO: He was (surprisingly) nominated last year. This season, his character dealt with a lot of things – from the (almost) loss of his estate to the death of his daughter. As an actor he had a lot to work with. CON: However, some may see the character as too unlikable (or even too stupid). And let’s be honest, last year, he was nominated mostly because of the overwhelming support for the show as a whole. If the show doesn’t get the same amount of support this season, he could easily be dropped out.

2. steve buscemi (boardwalk empire): PRO: These last three seasons, he’s been consistently nominated for all the big TV awards, including winning two SAG awards in the process. He’s an actor’s actor and I believe the industry respects him enough. CON: Is it just me (and I say this as someone who doesn’t watch the show regularly) or has this show been overshadowed by Breaking Bad and Homeland? Just sayin’…

3. bryan cranston (breaking bad): PRO: Three Emmys out of four nominations…and he just received his first SAG award this year.  This season was highly acclaimed and we’re all anticipating the second half of the last season in the process. I think it’s safe to say he’ll get nominated this year and last year too…he may even win again in the process. On a personal note, in my opinion, he gives one the best performances on TV. CON: Hey! Even James Gandolfini missed a year during his Sopranos run. Anything can happen!

4. jeff daniels (the newsroom): PRO: He’s actually never been nominated for any Emmys for his previous work. However, so far, for The Newsroom, he’s gotten a nominated for the Satellite, The Golden Globes, and the SAGs. All signs lead to “Emmy.” If voters watched only the pilot (like I have), he could still get in based on his fiery performance in that episode. CON: The Newsroom has gotten some pretty nasty reviews from critics (and even audiences). The whole show, including Daniels, could be snubbed.

5. michael c. hall (dexter): PRO: Last year, against all odds, despite scathing reviews for the season, Michael C. Hall still received a nomination. He received it over Hugh Laurie for his last season of House and presumed front runner Kelsey Grammar for Boss. That is how much voters like Michael C. Hall. This last season hasn’t gotten better reviews so, technically, it should be safe, right? CON: Something in my blood tells me this category will be shook up. This category is TOO competitive this year with too many new contenders for voters to give Hall his 6th nomination (without a win). But…I think I said the same thing last year so what do I know?

6. jon hamm (mad men): PRO: The season isn’t over yet, but, so far, I think Hamm has done enough to warrant another nomination. He’s an Emmy favorite. He’ll probably get nominated for 30 Rock again…even if he didn’t appear in any episodes. CON: Is Mad Men losing stock? The show got no wins last year. Hamm has never won an Emmy. Even newcomer Damien Lewis beat him last year. Will there be a time when voters will stop nominating Hamm altogether?

7. damien lewis (homeland): PRO: Damien Lewis, IMO, gives a tour-de-force performance. And he impressed me more this season than he did last season when he actually won. He deserves another nomination this year, maybe even a second Emmy. CON: Homeland got a lot of flack this year (mostly the second half of the season). And not everyone loves Lewis’s performance. But, again, this is a “critics vs. regular people vs. industry” situation.

8. andrew lincoln (the walking dead): PRO: I am the only person in America who doesn’t watch this show. Seriously, this show gets ratings that broadcast networks would die for. Even if this show isn’t really a reliable awards favorite, this wouldn’t be the first time an actor has received an Emmy nomination after a few seasons, especially when the critical reception for the show is getting warmer. CON: But, again, the show isn’t a reliable awards favorite. And besides a couple Saturn Award nominations, Lincoln has never been nominated for anything significant (SAGs and Golden Globes, etc.)

9. timothy olyphant (justified): PRO: As the rough and tough deputy, he earned a nomination for the show’s second season when the show was receiving a lot of Margo Martindale related buzz. He hasn’t gotten nominated for much since then, but he is still a top contender because he and the show still receives a lot of acclaim. CON: He wasn’t nominated last year. You know the old Emmy rule: “Once you’re out, you’re out forever!”

10. matthew rhys (the americans): PRO: This is a very new show that hasn’t had much of a chance to pick awards steam. However, Matthew Rhys just received a TCA nomination, and Critics Choice nomination, and tons of critical acclaim. CONS: You’d have to be ballsy to put him in your final top 6 (esp. considering everyone nominated last year is eligible this year). But predict him if you must.

11. kevin spacey (house of cards): PRO: Like Rhys, he’s on a very new show that has gotten some really nice critical notice. Unlike Rhys, he is a terribly established actor with two Oscars and a couple Emmy nominations for previous works. After three episodes, I found the show a little boring to be honest, but I found his performance invigorating and droll. CON: If this show had premiered on traditional television and not the internet, I’d probably be more confident of his chances.

Other strong contenders: Kevin Bacon (The Following), Andre Braugher (Last Resort), Hugh Dancy (Hannibal), Michael Emerson (Person of Interest),

Long shots worth considering: Patrick J. Adams (Suits), Simon Baker (The Mentalist), Kelsey Grammer (Boss), Charlie Hunnam (Sons of Anarchy), Jeremy Irons (The Borgias), Peter Krause (Parenthood), Gabriel Macht (Suits), William H. Macy (Shameless), Jonny Lee Miller (Sherlock)

Read the ballots here to see who else was submitted in this category. Thanks for reading! More coming soon! For more Emmy stuff, click here.

2013
06/12
CATEGORY
awards
breaking bad
drama
emmy awards
emmys
nominations
predictions
reflection
review
television
tv
TAGS










2 comments

2013 Emmy Predictions (Top Contenders) – Lead Actor in a Comedy Series


charlie sheen anger management

Interestingly enough, there was a time when, before the actual nominations came out, voters would narrow down all the contenders to the “top 10″. They obviously don’t do that anymore. But…we can still assume which contenders are at the top of the voter’s minds. Before I release my official nomination predictions around early July, I am going to run down which 10 or so contenders are the biggest threats…and maybe some personal long shots that I believe voters should consider. Here we go!

(Yeah…I copied that opening paragraph from last season…deal with it.)

For more Emmy stuff, click here.

Here are the top Emmy contenders for Lead Actor in a Comedy Series. In alphabetical order…

1. alec baldwin (30 rock): PRO: He was nominated for the first 6 seasons of the show…there’s no reason he shouldn’t be nominated for the 7th (esp. considering it’s the last season.) He already has two Emmys on his shelf. CON: Out with the old, in with the…”not as old”? Maybe?

2. jason bateman (arrested development): PRO: Big movie star is back for Emmy contention. He was nominated for the show’s second season, so voters clearly like him in this role. CON: Despite the hype, this wasn’t the most critically acclaimed season of comedy. Considering he’s only been nominated once, maybe voters don’t like him that much.

3. louis ck (louie): PRO: He’s been nominated the last two years (for the show’s first two seasons of course). He won two Emmys last year for writing and for his variety special. I honestly don’t know a single person who dislikes him or the show. CON: It’s a little strange that the actual show has never been nominated for Comedy Series. So, who knows what the voters are thinking??

4. don cheadle (house of lies): PRO: He was nominated last year. He won a Golden Globe this year. He is a solid lead in an overall solid show. CON: This just isn’t a show that’s talked about much. Now saying that Cheadle isn’t deserving of a nomination…but his imminent nod mostly hang on “name recognition” tbh.

5. jon cryer (two and a half men): PRO: A bitch load of nominations. Two wins (one for supporting and one for leading last year). High ratings. High salary. God…I wish I had his life. CON: I don’t know. He is literally the new Tony Shalhoub. Maybe the small bit of backlash from his win last year may make voters rethink things (like when Kyra Sedwick was snubbed a couple years ago the year after shockingly beating Julianna Margulies).

6. johnny galecki (the big bang theory): PRO: Yeah, he was snubbed last year (after getting a nomination the year before). But it just seems like the show’s ratings are getting higher and higher. He could sneak back in. CON: Between him and Jim Parsons, Jim Parsons will always have the edge…by a significant margin. Johnny Galecki is not getting a nomination without Parsons.

7. jake johnson (new girl): PRO: If last year was the year of Schmidt, this was the year of Nick Miller. He has consistently become one of the most entertaining and endearing things about New Girl. And with a recent TCA nomination under his belt, he has officially become the strongest “new contender” in this category CON: Although moving to Lead might have been a strategic way to avoid competing against last year nominee Max Greenfield…it might also be a hurdle considering Zooey Deschanel is the “true lead” of the show.

8. matt leblanc (episodes): PRO: His show wasn’t eligible last year, but he was nominated the year before. He also won a Golden Globe for this award. And the second season got a lot of acclaim, even more so than the first season. CON: However, as much as I love this show and his performance, I still see this as a toss up. A lot has happened since the second season finished. Have the voters remembered enough?

9. jim parson (the big bang theory): PRO: The two-time Emmy winner is male MVP of a comedy series that gets higher ratings than Amercan Idol. Any questions? CON: This last season hasn’t been the most acclaimed (I wouldn’t know personally because I didn’t watch the show this season). I could reasonably see the voters dropping Parsons “Charle Sheen-style.” Speaking of Charlie Sheen,,,

10. charlie sheen (anger management): PRO: This is the first year the show has been eligible, but Charlie Sheen was nominated four times in a row for Two and a Half Men before the voters (and the show itself later) cut him off. The show has crazily high ratings (for cable) and a 90 episode renewal (something I thought was only reserved for Tyler Perry). He is technically an Emmy favorite and contender, even if the show gets a “meh” critical reception. CON: His show is popular with regular people, but does the “industry” like him? I’m not sure if the people voting for Jon Cryer would also add Charlie Sheen to their ballot.

Other strong contenders: Tim Allen (Last Man Standing),  Billy Gardell (Mike and Molly), Ashton Kutcher (Two and a Half Men), Adam Scott (Parks and Recreation)

Long shots worth considering: Rob Corddry (Children’s Hospital), Garrett Dillahunt (Raising Hope), David Duchovny (Californication), Rob Lowe (Parks and Recreation), Joel McHale (Community), Matthew Morrison (Glee), Matthew Perry (Go On), Elijah Wood (Wilfred)

Even longer shots I recommend checking out: Justin Bartha and Andrew Rannells (The New Normal). They have no chance in hell, but I love them both anyway!

Read the ballots here to see who else was submitted in this category. Thanks for reading! More coming soon! For more Emmy stuff, click here.

2013
06/11
CATEGORY
30 rock
awards
emmy awards
emmys
glee
nominations
predictions
reflection
review
television
tv
TAGS










3 comments

Unassuming Euonym’s 2013 Emmy Center


This is the place where I’ll make predictions, review submissions, and do anything else Emmy-related (actually, those two first things might be it but…still…worth the read.) Bookmark this page and check back regularly for updates.

REVIEWING THE BALLOTS: TOP CONTENDERS

Lead Actor in a Comedy Series

Lead Actor in a Drama Series

Lead Actress in a Comedy Series

Lead Actress in a Drama Series

Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series

Supporting Actor in a Drama Series

Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series

Supporting Actress in a Drama Series

More coming soon…

EMMY TALK

The “Locks”

2013
06/11
CATEGORY
awards
emmy awards
emmys
predictions
reflection
review
television
tv
TAGS








8 comments

2013 Early Emmy Talk #1(The “locks”)


modern family

Last year, when I did this post for the 2012 Emmys, I actually predicted most of the locks right. The only ones I got wrong was Parks and Recreation for Series and John Slattery for Supporting Actor. However, I was still very weary about making a post this year because…for some reason, I feel like we’re in store for some really big surprises this summer. With some shows finishing out their tenures (and some new shows coming out), it’s tough figuring which shows and people are “safe.” The truth is…no one’s ever truly safe. Last year, everyone and their mother predicted Parks and Recreation and Louie for series nominations, and maybe even wins. Instead, they were surprisingly overturned by the likes of Veep (yay!) and Girls. So…it may be a bit silly to make predictions this early in the season…but, the Emmy bug is itching so…here goes.

Just a reminder, here are some ground rules:

1. This is not an OFFICIAL prediction list. I actually don’t make concrete predictions until voting’s over. I’m just going to name the 1 or 2 people in each category that, no matter what, will most likely get a nomination. That’s all…

2. I never consider new shows and new actors “locks.” Even if it’s PAINFULLY obvious, I leave them out for now. Remember when we all thought Luck would dominate? Exactly. (Side note: are there really any new series this year that are major contenders this year? Is House of Cards that big of a threat?)

3. …I think that’s it, actually.

OK. Here are the locks for the 2013 Emmys as of April 29th…

COMEDY

Lead Actor: With Larry David out of the way this year, we have one slot open…a slot that will probably be filled by either Matt LeBlanc (Episodes) or Jason Bateman (Arrested Development). However, this a category that seldom sees much movement so…Alec Baldwin (for his last season), Jim Parsons, Jon Cryer (last year’s winner) and Louie CK remain the four strongest contenders this year. Don Cheadle is very much in the game but…I can’t help thinking that last year might have been a “one time thing.” I guess we’ll see.

Lead Actress: She probably won’t win, but Tina Fey is most definitely getting in for her last season of 30 Rock. Last year’s winner and reliable Emmy favorite Julia Louis Dreyfuss is also in (and might even win again if the rest of season 2 is as good as these first 3 episodes). Parks and Recreation may be losing stock, but the likable Amy Poehler should stick around. And, last, I think America’s sweetheart Lena Dunham should have another chance of Emmy gold after being routinely snubbed last year. There aren’t many new contenders in this category, so we might very well see the same nominations we got last year. Newbie Mindy Kaling could squeeze in though…but again, I’m not considering newbies (not that I that I think she’s much of a lock anyway).

Supporting Actor: Is it too easy to assume that all four Modern Family dudes will be back this year? It’s tough because Arrested Development could bring a couple supporting actors of their own…and that would still be a perfect six. But still…supporting actor is tighter than you may think. I haven’t watched a single episode of MF this year so I have no inkling who’s been standing out. But…I think previous winners Eric Stonestreet and Ty Burrell are safe. If this is going to be the year that voters think outside the “Modern Family box.” then I believe those two will be left standing.

Supporting Actress: Because there are only two adult women in the Modern Family cast, I think it’ll be easier for Julie Bowen and Sofia Vergara to get in easily. As for everyone else? Good luck. If Jane Krakowski hadn’t been egregiously snubbed last year, she would definitely be a lock because it was 30 Rock‘s final season. However, because Emmy voters usually play the “Once you’re out, you’re always out” game, it’ll be a tough road for Jane K. Jessica Walter (AD) may also be a contender and could even win if given the chance. And last year’s surprise nominees Mayim Bialik and Merrit Weaver are still in the game…even though I’m quite confident both will be knocked out come July. (Hey…a Girls gotta eat.)

Series: There are three locks this year: Modern Family because…well…it’s Modern Family, 30 Rock (because their last season was universally acclaimed unlike the last seasons of past Emmy bait shows like Will and Grace. ) and Girls. Everything else is in a bubble. For Veep, it’s too early to say…although I would love to see it get nominated again. For Arrested Development….it’s even more too early because none of the episodes have premiered yet and, well, they could in theory be crap (also, we don’t quite know how voters will react to online television being in contention). Big Bang Theory remains the highest rated comedy on television. I haven’t watched it all this season (actually there are a lot of comedy shows I’ve missed on this season for one reason or another)…but I’ve heard even the most diehard fans say how uneven this season’s been. Louie SHOULD get in…but it’s last 2 (IMO superior) seasons have been snubbed so maybe we should just give it up. It’s also the last season of The Office but…unless the very last episode is spectacular, I’m not seeing right now. And, for the fun of it, let’s not leave out New Girls, Parks and Rec, Episodes, and Enlightened, k?

DRAMA

Lead Actor: The likes of Jeff Daniels (The Newsroom) and Kevin Spacey (House of Cards) have been getting a good amount of buzz…but they’re new shows so…Also, The Newsroom is a hella polarizing. Just sayin’. Anyway, I think the magic three (Bryan Cranston, Jon Hamm, Damian Lewis) will pop up. Steve Buscemi is a little shaky just because Boardwalk Empire isn’t a “hot button” show anymore (at least, that’s what it seems like to me…BTW, I don’t follow the show so maybe I’m wrong), but I still think it’s a lock. I think those 4 definitely have a better chance than Hugh Bonneville and Timothy Olyphant. Michael C. Hall will probably get a nomination, but I wouldn’t consider him a lock persay.

Lead Actress: Once again, I’m not going to put Elizabeth Moss (Mad Men) on the list because there’s still that slight chance she’ll switch to supporting (thus giving Jessica Pare a better chance to prevail). Who knows what’s up with Moss or her character or how long we’ll follow her this season? So…she’s not a lock. Call me strange but, like Lead Actor, I think there are 4 locks: Julianna Margulies, Claire Danes, Glenn Close (if she could manage a nomination last year, she’ll probably get in again this year for the last season of Damages) and Michelle Dockery (Golden Globe and SAG nominee who definitely stood out this last season of Downton Abbey). With Kathy Bates out, there is pretty much one slot open. Will it go to Kerry Washington? Connie Britton? Jessica Pare? Mariska Hargitay?

Supporting Actor: The Supporting Drama Actor category is looser than a…something that’s loose. Yeah, Aaron Paul and Peter Dinklage are virtual locks. But outside that…it’s anyone’s game. I mean, let’s remember, last year…two guys from Downton Abbey got in. You never know what the voters are thinking. I do believe Mandy Pantinkin (Homeland) and Jonathon Banks (Breaking Bad) are probably the next up…but they’ve never been nominated before [for these roles] so…again…very loose.

Supporting Actress: The Good Wife is in an interesting position. For the last three years, they’ve been able to hold on to those 2 supporting actress slots. But this year their hurt by a couple things. One, is Archie Panjabi’s really bad story line during the 1st half of the season. And two, the show as a whole being snubbed series which signifies that voters may be letting go of the series slowly but surely. Will these otherwise amazing actresses be the next victims? Only time will tell. Right now, they’re not locks. Maggie Smith and Anna Gunn (Breaking Bad) definitely are. (Hayden Panettiere FYC).

Series: It’s strange. All 6 nominees from last year could get in this year. In fact, that’s probably what I would predict if I were making a real prediction right now. However, for the sake of me not being bold, I’ll say that the only locks right now are Mad Men, Breaking Bad, and last year’s winner Homeland (even though critics and fans alike were very critical of the latter half of the season). Downton Abbey could be the token period piece / network show this category needs but…I dunno, it’s not everyone’s favorite show. And, hey, The Good Wife could come back and take the spot from Game of Thrones or Boardwalk Empire. Maybe? Probably not. House of Cards, The Newsroom, The Americans, and even Nashville are also contenders. But, again, I think it’ll probably just be the same 6 as last year…

Cool. I got that out of my system. Did I leave out any BIG contenders? Am I underestimating the power of Malibu County? What about Glee? Is that still a thing? Would it be so totally awesome if Shameless got any love besides Joan Cusack? Sound off below.

2013
04/29
CATEGORY
awards
connie britton
drama
emmy awards
emmys
glee
nominations
predictions
reflection
snubbed
television
the good wife
tv
TAGS












2 comments

Email Me!

Questions, concerns, anything:

unassumingeuonym@gmail.com

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.